Isolated curricular courses

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report

Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.

Mandatory

- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books

- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO

- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC

Optional

S1. Structure of natural language(s): sounds, words, phrases and texts;
S2. Linguistic standard(s) and variation;
S3. Sounds of European Portuguese: phonetics, phonology and spelling;
S4. Other aspects of graphic configuration: capitalization, accentuation and translineation; punctuation (basic principles);
S5. Lexicon: polysemy; homonymy; synonymy, antonymy; holonymy, meronymy;
S6. Morphology and syntax of European Portuguese: nominal inflection, verbal inflection; agreement (general rules);
S7. Semantics: verb tenses and moods;
S8. Phraseology: idioms of European Portuguese;
S9. Sentences: understanding and writing expository and argumentative paragraphs.

The final evaluation at the CU includes:
— Participation in classes: solving structural exercises or tasks involving the production of oral and/or written statements (30%);
— Final test focusing on text comprehension, grammar and written production (70%).
Approval at the CU implies an attendance rate of 70% or more. There are no exam options.

Mandatory

Azeredo, Mª Olga, Pinto, Mª Isabel Freitas M. & Lopes, Mª do Carmo Azeredo (2010). Da Comunicação à Expressão. Gramática Prática de Português. Lisboa: Lisboa Editora.
Gonçalves, Perpétua (2013). O Português em África. In Raposo, E.B.P. & outros (orgs). Gramática do Português. Lisboa: F.C.Gulbenkian. pp. 157-178.
Eliseu, André Simões, Cardeira, Esperança & Malagueiro, Susana (2008). Enciclopédia do Estudante 13. Língua Portuguesa I. Carnaxide: Santillana Constância.
Lourenço, Clenir, Ferreira, Emília & Cruz, Elizabeth Ceita Vera. (1997). 7 Vozes. Léxico Coloquial do Português Luso-Afro-Brasileiro. Lisboa: Lidel.
Mateus, Maria Helena Mira (2007). O Essencial sobre Norma e Variação. Lisboa: Caminho
Pinto, Paulo Feytor & Melo-Pfeifer (coords)(2018). Políticas Linguísticas em Português. Lisboa: Lidel.

Optional

Ançã, Helena, (2013). Saberes Vulgares de Africanos sobre a Língua Portuguesa: Um Contributo para o Português Língua Não Materna. In Bizarro, Rosa & outras (coord). Português Língua Não Materna: Investigação e Ensino. Lisboa: Lidel. pp. 82-91.
Cameia, Domingas R.T.D. (2013). Desenvolvimento da Competência Lexical na Aprendizagem da Língua Portuguesa. Um estudo com alunos angolanos. Dissertação de Mestrado em Desenvolvimento e Perturbações da Linguagem na Criança. Setúbal: ESS-IPS / FCSH-UNL [policopiado].
Charles, Maggie & Pecorari, Diane (2016). Introducing English for Academic Purposes. London: Routledge.
Duarte, Joana & outras (2013). Bilinguismo e Educação: Um Novo Currículo para a Formação de Professores. In Bizarro, Rosa & outras (coord). Português Língua Não Materna: Investigação e Ensino. Lisboa: Lidel. pp. 112-128.
Eliseu, André Simões, Cardeira, Esperança & Malagueiro, Susana (2008). Enciclopédia do Estudante 14. Língua Portuguesa II. Carnaxide: Santillana Constância.
Gonçalves, Perpétua (org) (2010). O Português Escrito por Estudantes Universitários: Descrição Linguística e Estratégias Didáticas. Maputo: Texto Editores Moçambique.
Gonçalves, Perpétua (2007). Pesquisa linguística e ensino do Português L2: Potencialidades das taxonomias de erros. In Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto, vol. 2. Porto: Universidade do Porto. pp. 61-76.
Gordon Jr., Raymond G. (ed) (2005). Ethnologue. Languages of the World. Fifteenth Edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. [parcialmente disponível em www.ethnologue.com].
Hyland, Ken (2006). English for Academic Purposes. An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
Inverno, Liliana (2009). A transição de Angola para o português vernáculo: estudo morfossintático do sintagma nominal. In Carvalho, Ana (coord). Línguas em Contacto. Madrid / Frankfurt: Iberoamericana / Vervuert. pp. 87-106.
Ngunga, Armindo (2004). Introdução à Linguística Bantu. Maputo: Imprensa Universitária.
Petter, Margarida M. T. (2008). Uma hipótese explicativa do contato entre o português e as línguas africanas. In Papia Revista de Crioulos de Base Ibérica. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília. pp. 9-19.
Pinto, Paulo Feytor (2010). O Essencial sobre Política de Língua. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional / Casa da Moeda.
Pinto, Paulo Feytor (2013), Intervenção não-formal de inclusão de estudantes angolanos: novos desafios, novas realidades, novas respostas. In Revista Mediações - vol. 2, No. 1, pp.45-63

1. What it means to research in anthropology - a learning process (Ingold)
2. Methods of working and organising information
2.1 Introduction: how and why do we become readers?
2.2 Methods of organising and reducing information
2.3 Plagiarism and paraphrasing
2.4 Forms and function of bibliographic citation and referencing
3. Searching online - Criteria for evaluating information made available online and the limits and advantages of generative AI
4. Reading, discussing and summarising canonical and non-canonical classic texts
5. How to develop anthropological curiosity and imagination: stimulating attention, observation, recording and organising data, description
6. Describing, relating, arguing.

On periodical assessment two evaluation tools shall be used:
1) Participation in teaching activities - 20%
2) Portfolio consisting on the exercises conducted in the classroom and learning reports- 30%.
3) Final report Observation exercise- 50 %.
Students who do not undergo to periodical assessment or do not reach 10 points shall undergo to examination.

Mandatory

Winkin, Y. 1998 A Nova Comunicação. Da teoria ao trabalho de campo, Campinas/S.Paulo: Papirus Editora
Peretz, H. 2000 Métodos de Sociologia, Lisboa: Temas e Debates.
Hall, E.T. 1986 A Dimensão Oculta, Lisboa: Relógio d Água.
Hall, E.T.1994 A Linguagem Silenciosa, Lisboa: Relógio d'Água.
Gofman, E.1993 A Apresentação do Eu na Vida de Todos os Dias, Lisboa: Relógio D'Água.
Foucault, M.1987 Vigiar e Punir. Nascimento da Prisão, Petrópolis: Ed.Vozes.
Durkheim, E.1988 As Regras do Método Sociológico, Lisboa: Ed.Presença.
Castro, Celso 2022 Além do Cânone, Rio de Janeiro, FGV Editora
Cerveira, M.E.2002A Referência bibliográfica de documentos escritos e eletrónicos?, Rev.da Faculdade de Letras. Ciências e Técnicas do Património, Porto, 2002, 1ª série, vol.I, p.111-128
Clanchy, J.&Ballard, B.2000 Como escrever ensaios. Um guia para estudantes Lisboa:Temas e Debates

Optional

http://weblog.educ.ar/educacion-tics/archives/002750.php(sobre a leitura na internet)
http://www.abed.org.br/antiga/htdocs/paper_visem/denise_bertoli_braga.htm (sobre o uso da internet e a aprendizagem de línguas estrangeiras)
http://www.mayer.cps.k12.il.us/Strategies_that_Work/STW.htm (sobre uso de recursos e estratégias de leitura na net)
http://litsite.alaska.edu/workbooks/readingstrategies.html (planos de exercícios para desenvolver estratégias de leitura)
http://www.justreadnow.com/strategies/index.htm (planos de exercícios para desenvolver estratégias de leitura)
http://curry.edschool.virginia.edu/go/readquest/ (planos de exercícios para desenvolver estratégias de leitura ? especificamente orientado para alunos de Ciências Sociais)
http://www.howard.k12.md.us/langarts/Curriculum/strategies.htm (planos de exercícios para desenvolver estratégias de leitura)
http://www.greece.k12.ny.us/instruction/ela/6-12/Reading/Reading%20Strategies/reading%20strategies%20index.htm (planos de exercícios para desenvolver estratégias de leitura)
http://www.allamericareads.org/lessonplan/strategies.htm (planos de exercícios para desenvolver estratégias de leitura)
Sites sobre estratégias de leitura e de escrita:
Winkin, Yves 1996 ?La maîtrise visuelle de l?ordinaire?, in Antropologie de la Communication. De la théorie au terrain, Paris/Bruxelles: De Boeck & Larcier S.A., pp. 123-138
Reis, F. (2016) ?Exercício de Observação (não Participante) In S. Bernardes e S. Carvalhosa (Orgs.) Manual de Práticas Pedagógicas de Integração da Investigação no Ensino Superior. Lisboa: ISCTE-IUL, pp. 58-65.
Morais, José, 1997 A Arte de Ler. Psicologia cognitiva da leitura Lisboa: Cosmos.
Manguel, Alberto, 1996 A History of Reading London: Flamingo (há versão em Português).
Madureira Pinto, José e Augusto S. Silva [orgs.] 1987 Metodologia das Ciências Sociais Porto: Afrontamento.
Jonathan, Boyarin, 1992 The Ethnography of Reading, University of California Press.
Firmino da Costa & Patrícia Ávila 1998, ?Problemas da/de Literacia: uma investigação na sociedade portuguesa contemporânea? in: Ler História, nº35.
Connerton, Paul, 1993 Como as Sociedades Recordam Oeiras: Celta
Coelho, Adolfo,1993, ?Cultura e Analfabetismo? in João Leal (Org.) Adolfo Coelho. Obra Etnográfica vol. II Cultura Popular e Educação, Lisboa: Publicações D. Quixote, p. 251-272.
Chartier, Roger, 1996, El orden de los libros. Lectores, autores, bibliotecas en Europa entre los siglos XIV y XVIII, Barcelona: Guedisa.
Caria, Telmo H. (org.), 2002 Experiência Etnográfica em Ciências Sociais, Porto: Ed. Afrontamento.
Calvino, Italo, 1994, Porquê Ler os Clássicos?, Lisboa: Teorema.
Bloom, Harold, 2000, Como ler e porquê, Lisboa: Caminho.

CP1 - Introduction to AI and Generative AI:
* Theoretical exposition on the historical context, evolution and important concepts about Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Generative AI
CP2 - Prompt Engineering:
* Explanation of good practices for interacting with generative language models
CP3 - Generative AI Tools:
* Exploration of multiple Generative AI tools, based on text, images and videos
CP4 - Formation of argumentative content:
* Development of creative solutions using argumentation practices and Generative AI tools
CP5 - Rules for scientific writing:
* Application of citation and referencing standards (APA standards) in academic writing

The Semester-Long Assessment includes the following activities:
1. Individual Activities (50%)
1.1 Prompt Simulations with AI Tools in an Academic Context (20%):
* Description: The student must create a clear/justified, well-structured prompt, according to the script proposed by the instructor in class.
* Assessment: (submit in Moodle), communication and teamwork skills based on the quality of the prompt simulations performed.
1.2 Oral Defense - Group Presentation - 5 min. Discussion - 5 min. (30%):
* Description: Each student must present their contributions to the work completed to the class.
* Assessment: After the student's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session.
2. Group Activities (50%) [students are organized into groups of up to 5 students, randomly selected], which include:
* Group presentations, reviews, edits, and validations of AI-generated content. The assessment (to be submitted in Moodle) includes gathering relevant information, assessing the clarity and innovative nature of the use of structured prompts.
* Development of strategies for reviewing, editing, and validating AI-generated content. Students will be asked to critically evaluate and reflect on the ethical challenges of integrating AI into an academic environment. The assessment (to be submitted in Moodle) will consist of correcting the work based on the accuracy and quality of the reviews and edits, as well as student participation in providing feedback to their peers.
* Final Project Presentation Simulations, where groups choose a topic and create a fictitious project following the structure of a technical report or scientific text. They present their project in class (5 min.) and discuss the topic (5 min.). The assessment (to be submitted in Moodle) will consider the organization, content, correct use of the structure, and procedures of the academic work.

General Considerations:
Feedback on student performance in each activity will be provided during the Semester Assessment.
To be assessed throughout the semester, students must attend 80% of classes and achieve a score of at least 7 points in each assessment.
If there are questions about participation in the activities, the instructor may request an oral discussion.
The group must ensure that at least one computer is available for each group to allow for classroom activities.
There will be no final exam assessment; passing will be determined by the weighted average of the assessments throughout the semester. Assessments in the second and special assessment periods will have an alternative assessment method, so any students wishing to take the assessment in these assessment periods should contact their instructor in advance to learn about the assessment procedure.

Mandatory

Ribeiro, A. & Rosa, A. (2024). Descobrindo o potencial do CHATGPT em sala de aula: guia para professores e alunos. Atlantic Books.
Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in education and teaching international, 61(2), 228-239.
d’Alte, P., & d’Alte, L. (2023). Para uma avaliação do ChatGPT como ferramenta auxiliar de escrita de textos acadêmicos. Revista Bibliomar, São Luís, 22(1), 122-138. DOI: 10.18764/2526-6160v22n1.2023.6.
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274.

Optional

Cowen, T., & Tabarrok, A. T. (2023). How to learn and teach economics with large language models, including GPT. GMU Working Paper in Economics No. 23-18. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4391863
Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing.

CP1 - Introduction to AI and Generative AI:
* Theoretical exposition on the historical context, evolution and important concepts about Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Generative AI
CP2 - Prompt Engineering:
* Explanation of good practices for interacting with generative language models
CP3 - Generative AI Tools:
* Exploration of multiple Generative AI tools, based on text, images and videos
CP4 - Formation of argumentative content:
* Development of creative solutions using argumentation practices and Generative AI tools
CP5 - Rules for scientific writing:
* Application of citation and referencing standards (APA standards) in academic writing

The Semester-Long Assessment includes the following activities:
1. Individual Activities (50%)
1.1 Prompt Simulations with AI Tools in an Academic Context (20%):
* Description: The student must create a clear/justified, well-structured prompt, according to the script proposed by the instructor in class.
* Assessment: (submit in Moodle), communication and teamwork skills based on the quality of the prompt simulations performed.
1.2 Oral Defense - Group Presentation - 5 min. Discussion - 5 min. (30%):
* Description: Each student must present their contributions to the work completed to the class.
* Assessment: After the student's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session.
2. Group Activities (50%) [students are organized into groups of up to 5 students, randomly selected], which include:
* Group presentations, reviews, edits, and validations of AI-generated content. The assessment (to be submitted in Moodle) includes gathering relevant information, assessing the clarity and innovative nature of the use of structured prompts.
* Development of strategies for reviewing, editing, and validating AI-generated content. Students will be asked to critically evaluate and reflect on the ethical challenges of integrating AI into an academic environment. The assessment (to be submitted in Moodle) will consist of correcting the work based on the accuracy and quality of the reviews and edits, as well as student participation in providing feedback to their peers.
* Final Project Presentation Simulations, where groups choose a topic and create a fictitious project following the structure of a technical report or scientific text. They present their project in class (5 min.) and discuss the topic (5 min.). The assessment (to be submitted in Moodle) will consider the organization, content, correct use of the structure, and procedures of the academic work.

General Considerations:
Feedback on student performance in each activity will be provided during the Semester Assessment.
To be assessed throughout the semester, students must attend 80% of classes and achieve a score of at least 7 points in each assessment.
If there are questions about participation in the activities, the instructor may request an oral discussion.
The group must ensure that at least one computer is available for each group to allow for classroom activities.
There will be no final exam assessment; passing will be determined by the weighted average of the assessments throughout the semester. Assessments in the second and special assessment periods will have an alternative assessment method, so any students wishing to take the assessment in these assessment periods should contact their instructor in advance to learn about the assessment procedure.

Mandatory

Ribeiro, A. & Rosa, A. (2024). Descobrindo o potencial do CHATGPT em sala de aula: guia para professores e alunos. Atlantic Books.
Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in education and teaching international, 61(2), 228-239.
d’Alte, P., & d’Alte, L. (2023). Para uma avaliação do ChatGPT como ferramenta auxiliar de escrita de textos acadêmicos. Revista Bibliomar, São Luís, 22(1), 122-138. DOI: 10.18764/2526-6160v22n1.2023.6.
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274.

Optional

Cowen, T., & Tabarrok, A. T. (2023). How to learn and teach economics with large language models, including GPT. GMU Working Paper in Economics No. 23-18. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4391863
Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing.

CP1 - Introduction to AI and Generative AI:
* Theoretical exposition on the historical context, evolution and important concepts about Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Generative AI
CP2 - Prompt Engineering:
* Explanation of good practices for interacting with generative language models
CP3 - Generative AI Tools:
* Exploration of multiple Generative AI tools, based on text, images and videos
CP4 - Formation of argumentative content:
* Development of creative solutions using argumentation practices and Generative AI tools
CP5 - Rules for scientific writing:
* Application of citation and referencing standards (APA standards) in academic writing

The Semester-Long Assessment includes the following activities:
1. Individual Activities (50%)
1.1 Prompt Simulations with AI Tools in an Academic Context (20%):
* Description: The student must create a clear/justified, well-structured prompt, according to the script proposed by the instructor in class.
* Assessment: (submit in Moodle), communication and teamwork skills based on the quality of the prompt simulations performed.
1.2 Oral Defense - Group Presentation - 5 min. Discussion - 5 min. (30%):
* Description: Each student must present their contributions to the work completed to the class.
* Assessment: After the student's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session.
2. Group Activities (50%) [students are organized into groups of up to 5 students, randomly selected], which include:
* Group presentations, reviews, edits, and validations of AI-generated content. The assessment (to be submitted in Moodle) includes gathering relevant information, assessing the clarity and innovative nature of the use of structured prompts.
* Development of strategies for reviewing, editing, and validating AI-generated content. Students will be asked to critically evaluate and reflect on the ethical challenges of integrating AI into an academic environment. The assessment (to be submitted in Moodle) will consist of correcting the work based on the accuracy and quality of the reviews and edits, as well as student participation in providing feedback to their peers.
* Final Project Presentation Simulations, where groups choose a topic and create a fictitious project following the structure of a technical report or scientific text. They present their project in class (5 min.) and discuss the topic (5 min.). The assessment (to be submitted in Moodle) will consider the organization, content, correct use of the structure, and procedures of the academic work.

General Considerations:
Feedback on student performance in each activity will be provided during the Semester Assessment.
To be assessed throughout the semester, students must attend 80% of classes and achieve a score of at least 7 points in each assessment.
If there are questions about participation in the activities, the instructor may request an oral discussion.
The group must ensure that at least one computer is available for each group to allow for classroom activities.
There will be no final exam assessment; passing will be determined by the weighted average of the assessments throughout the semester. Assessments in the second and special assessment periods will have an alternative assessment method, so any students wishing to take the assessment in these assessment periods should contact their instructor in advance to learn about the assessment procedure.

Mandatory

Ribeiro, A. & Rosa, A. (2024). Descobrindo o potencial do CHATGPT em sala de aula: guia para professores e alunos. Atlantic Books.
Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in education and teaching international, 61(2), 228-239.
d’Alte, P., & d’Alte, L. (2023). Para uma avaliação do ChatGPT como ferramenta auxiliar de escrita de textos acadêmicos. Revista Bibliomar, São Luís, 22(1), 122-138. DOI: 10.18764/2526-6160v22n1.2023.6.
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274.

Optional

Cowen, T., & Tabarrok, A. T. (2023). How to learn and teach economics with large language models, including GPT. GMU Working Paper in Economics No. 23-18. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4391863
Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing.