The nature of this course does not allow the definition of a specific program, since it aims at promoting the ability to transfer previously held competencies to the development of an intervention project. Therefore, this course is based on the autonomous work presented at the supervision and seminar sessions.

Despite the absence of a traditional program, some of the contents that will be taught include:
PC1 -Parts of an intervention project:
PC1.1. Defining the research problem;
PC1.2. Theoretical background: main concepts, outcome variables, etiological model, general goals and hypotheses;
PC1.3. Needs diagnosis;
PC1.4. Defining the intervention program: process and outcome goals, resources and activities, outputs, target-population and risks/threats.
PC1.5. Defining the evaluation method;
PC1.6.References and annexes

And also

PC2. Preparing for the oral defense

The intervention project should be defended in public, where the following components will be evaluated: a) technical component; b) written format, and c) oral presentation and arguments. The final grade of this course corresponds to the final grade of the project developed.

Mandatory

Punch, K.F. (2006). Developing effective research proposals (2nd Ed.) Londres: SAGE. Knowlton, L., & Phillips, C. (2008). The Logic Model guidebook: Better strategies for great results. London: Sage. Ferguson, J. (1999). The grant seekers? guide to project evaluation. New York: Aspen. Hall, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research. London: Sage. Buunk, A., & Van Vugt, M. (2007). Applying Social Psychology: From Problems to Solutions. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Bartholomew, L., Parcel, G. , Kok, G., & Gottlieb, N. (2006). Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach (3ª Ed.). SF: Jossey-Bass. American Psychological Association (2009). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington: APA. Normas orientadoras para a dissertação ou trabalho de projecto de mestrado (ISCTE, 2009) http://mess.de.iscte.pt/Harmonizacao_Doc_unico_V6.pdf

Optional

Santos, N. R. (2005). Projectos de investigação em Psicologia: Guia para a sua elaboração e execução. Évora: NEPUE. Bem, D.J. (1995). Writing a review article for Psychological Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 172-177.

PC1. Steps and processes for designing a research project: Structure, development stages, and norms for the elaboration of a research project;
PC2. Literature Review: Goals and features of a literature review; Literature review and the development of the argument; Planning and conducting a literature review
PC3. Outlining the methodological strategy:
Understanding the link between conceptual and operationalization stages; Research design; planning data analysis; ethical issues in research;
PC4: Analyzing and presenting the results, discussion, and conclusions; references and appendices.
PC5: Preparing the public defense of the dissertation/applied work.

The collective seminars aim to prepare students for the final writing and public defense of their dissertations/applied project, but the completion of the seminar classes does not directly include these final stages. They are designed to ensure that students are prepared and equipped with the knowledge, skills, competencies, and confidence to present and defend their dissertation or applied project publicly. Since attendance at seminars is crucial for the development of the project, the jury will be provided with information about the student's involvement as an additional element to contextualize the final evaluation.
The dissertation/applied project must be presented according to the standards and within the deadlines established by Iscte-IUL and is defended in public where the technical components, the written work, and the presentation and defense are evaluated. The final evaluation occurs after the public discussion of the dissertation/applied project and subsequent evaluation.

Mandatory

APA. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA
Bishop, D.V. & Thompson, P.A. (2024). Evaluating What works: An Intuitive Guide to Intervention Research for Practitioners. CRC Press. Available online: https://bookdown.org/dorothy_bishop/Evaluating-What-Works/)
Bui, Yvonne N. (2014). How to write a master's thesis (2nd ed). Sage.
Harrison & Rentzelas (2021). Your psychology dissertation. Sage.
Heard, S. B. (2021). The scientist's guide to writing: How to write more easily and effectively throughout your scientific career (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Pennington, C. (2023). A student’s guide to Open Science: Using the replication crisis to reform psychology. Open University Press.

Optional

"Swetnam, D. (2000). Writing your dissertation: How to plan, prepare and present successful work. How to books. Ridley, D. (2008). The literature review: a step-by-step guide for students. Sage. Reis, H.T., & Judd, C. (2000, eds.). Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge University Press. Punch, K.F. (2006). Developing effective research proposals. SAGE. Mohrman, S. A. & Lawler III, E. E. (2011). Useful research: advancing theory and practice. Berret-Koehler Publishers. Garrido, M. V. & Prada, M. (Eds.) Manual de competências académicas (pp. 245-280). Sílabo. Hall, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research. Sage. Hailman, J. P., & Strier B. (2006). Planning, proposing, and presenting science effectively: a guide for graduate students and researchers in the behavioral sciences and biology. Cambridge University Press. Friedland, A., J., & Folt, C. L. (2009). Writing successful science proposals (2ª ed.). Yale University Press Fleming, R. S., & Kowalsky, M. (2021). Survival Skills for Thesis and Dissertation Candidates. Springer International Publishing. Walliman, N. (2005). Your research project. SAGE.

The nature of this C.U. does not allow the definition of a specific program. In fact, more important than the acquisition of new knowledge is the aplication of previously acquired knowlegde, the consolidation of attitudes and the practice of previously held competencies to the pursuit of the internship's goals. Therefore, this C.U. is based on the individual work developed by the student (autonomously and at the internship organization) and presented at the individual and collective supervision sessions .
Despite the absence of a traditional program, syllabus include:
S1. Outline and conceptualization of an internship plan
S2: Ethics and deontology in professional practice
S3: Communication and conflict management
S4: Intervention and decision making in a multidisciplinary context.
S5: Evidence-based psychosocial assessment and intervention processes in health and well-being contexts.
S6: Preparation of the final internship report

The internship assessment is carried out exclusively throughout the semester: 20% performance at the internship location, assessment carried out by the supervisor at the internship location, based on an evaluation grid provided by the Department of Psychology; 15% participation and presentation of internship plans in internship seminars, carried out by the seminar coordinator; 15% assessment of the learning process throughout the year, carried out by the internal supervisor, based on a grid provided by the Department; 50% final internship report, evaluated by a professor/researcher from the Department, other than the internal internship supervisor, and based on an evaluation grid provided by the Department.

Mandatory

Baird, B. (2016). The internship, practicum, and field placement handbook: A guide for the helping professions (7ª ed.). Pearson Education
Bartholemew Eldredge et al. (2016). Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach (4ª Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Ordem dos Psicólogos Portugueses (2011). Código Deontológico da Ordem dos Psicólogos Portugueses. Diário da República, 2.ª série, 78, 20 de Abril de 2011, 17931- 17936.
Ordem dos Psicólogos Portugueses (2016). O perfil dos Psicólogos da Saúde. O.P.P.
Frederick, S.H., & king, M. (2019). The successful internship: personal, professional and civic development in experiential learning (5ª Ed.). Belmont: Brooks/Cole.

Optional

"A.P.A. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington: American Psychological Association. A.P.A. (2024). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7ª Ed.).Washington: A.P.A. Smith, M. (2010). Handbook of Program Evaluation for Social Work and Health Professionals. New York: Oxford University Press

1. Moderation, mediation and moderated mediation
1.1. Moderated effect: interaction effect
1.2. Mediated effect: chain of effects
1.3. Moderated mediation: conditional indirect effect
1.4. Discussion of papers with Moderation, mediation and moderated mediation
2. Moderation using multiple linear regression
2.1. Main effect and interaction effect
2.2. Quantitative moderator
2.3. Dummy moderator
2.4. Statistical software application (PROCESS in JASP and in SPSS)
2.5. Report results in a thesis/paper
3. Mediation using multiple linear regression
3.1. Quantitative mediator
3.2. Estimate and test indirect effect by bootstrapping
3.3. Statistical software application (PROCESS in JASP and in SPSS)
3.4. Report results in a thesis/paper
4. Moderated mediation using multiple linear regression
4.1. Exploring the model
4.2. Test conditional indirect effects
4.3. Statistical software application (PROCESS in JASP and in SPSS)
4.4. Report results in a thesis/paper

Assessment during the semester includes:
1. Individual assessment - Written test (65%) - with a minimum mark of 8.5
2. Group assessment - Work (35%) - with a minimum mark of 10.

Assessment by exam includes two tasks:
1. Written test (65%) with a minimum mark of 8.5
2. An assignment (35%) handed in on the day of the exam. Minimum mark of 10.

Mandatory

Eliyana A, Pradana II. (2020). The Effect of Work-Family Conflict on Job Satisfaction with Organizational Commitment as the Moderator Variable. Sys Rev Pharm , 11(10): 429-437. doi:10.31838/srp.2020.10.66
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. and Anderson, R. (2019) Multivariate Data Analysis, Pearson New International Edition (8th ed).
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. 3rd, Guilford Press.
Jiang, L., J. and Matthew J. (2018). Work and Affective Commitment: A Moderated Mediation Model of Positive Work Reflection and Work Centrality. J Bus Psychol 33, 545?558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9509-6.
Maroco, J. (2010). Análise Estatística com o PASW Statistics (ex-SPSS), Pero Pinheiro.
Tabachnick, B. and Fidell, L. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics, USA, Person International Edition, 6ª ed.

https://jasp-stats.org/faq/what-does-jasp-stand-for/

Optional

Baron, R e Kenny D. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Preacher, K. J. e Hayes, A. F (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879-891,
Important links:
Kenny, D. A. (2011). Moderation http://davidakenny.net/cm/moderation.htm
Kenny, D. A. (2012). Mediation, http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm
Baron, R e Kenny D., The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations, 1986, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.,
Preacher, K. J. e Hayes, A. F., Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models,, 2008, Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879-891, http://quantpsy.org/pubs/preacher_hayes_2008b.pdf.,
Kenny, D. A., Moderation http://davidakenny.net/cm/moderation.htm, 2011, http://davidakenny.net/cm/moderation.htm,
Kenny, D. A., Mediation, 2012, http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm, http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm

CP1 | Introduction to Social Psychology of Health:
1. From the biomedical model to a biopsychosocial perspective;
2. Social determinants of health behaviors

CP2- Deliberative models to predict health behaviors:
1. Classic models: socio-cognitive theories of planned behavior; Protection motivation; Health beliefs Model.
2. Models focusing on Goal setting and self-regulation
3. Stage models
4. Limits of the deliberative approach and new perspectives.

CP3 -Non-deliberative /automatic aspects of behavior in the context of health:
1. The distinction between automatic and controlled processes
2. Automatic effects on health contexts: Habits, cognitive biases and their determinants.

CP4-Methods and individual intervention strategies:
1. Methods and intervention strategies on socio-cognitive determinants of health behavior
2. Intervention methods for changing automatic aspects of individual behaviors: cueing and cognitive interventions

The continuous assessments includes the following mandatory elements.

1. Written report on a logical model of a health problem (in groups, 3 to 5 students)
2. Oral presentation (in group) of illustrating health intervention methods (20%);
3. Individual assessment at the end of the semester (55%).

To be approved, students must have at least 9.5 values in all assessments. Students who are not enrolled or fail in the continuous evaluation must be evaluated by a final exam (100%).

Mandatory

Conner, M., & Norman P. M. (2015). Predicting health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (3rd ed.). Open University Press
Brannon, L., Updegraff, J.A., & Feist, J. (2021). Health psychology: An introduction to behavior and health (10th ed.). Wadsworth
Hagger , M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N., & Lintunen, T. (2020). The Handbook of Behavior Change. Cambridge University Press
Mason, P. (2019). Health behavior change: A guide for practitioners. Churchill Livinstone
Michie, S. F., West, R., Campbell, R., Brown, J., & Gainforth, H. (2014). ABC of behaviour change theories. Silverback Publishing
Ogden, J (2023). Health Psychology: A textbook (7th edition). McGraw-Hill
Prestwich, A., Kenworthy, J., & Conner, M. (2017). Health behavior change: Theories, methods and interventions. Taylor & Francis

Optional

Browning, C. J., & Thomas, S. A. (2005; Eds.). Behavioural change: An evidence-based handbook for social and public health. Elsevier.
Cameron, L.D., & Leventhal, H. (2003, Eds.). The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour. Routledge.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 41-84). Elsevier.
Eldredge , L. K. B., Markham, C. M., Ruiter, R. A. C., Fernández, M. E., Kok, G. & Parcel, G., (2016). Planning health promotion programs: An intervention mapping approach (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692-731.
Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., & Viswanath, K. (Eds.) (2008). Health behaviour and health education: Theory, research and practice (4th ed.). Jossey Bass.
Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 162-176.
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 174-180.
Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2007). What is automaticity? An analysis of its component features and their interrelations. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 11-50). Psychology Press.
Jones, A., Hardman, C. A., Lawrence, N., & Field, M. (2017). Cognitive training as a potential treatment for overweight and obesity: A critical review of the evidence. Appetite, 124, 50-67.
Lally, P., & Gardner, B. (2013). Promoting habit formation. Health Psychology Review, 7(sup1), S137-S158.
Papies, E. K. (2016). Health goal priming as a situated intervention tool: How to benefit from nonconscious motivational routes to health behaviour. Health Psychology Review, 10, 408-424.
Wiers, R.W., Houben, K., Roefs, A., de Jong, P., Hofmann, W., & Alan W. Stacy, A. W. (2010). Implicit cognition in health psychology: Why common sense goes out the window. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 463-488). The Guilford Press.
Wood, W., & Runger, D. (2016). Psychology of habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 289-314. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417

S1-Groups and relationships between groups and health:
1.Social groups and health inequalities
2.The relationship between stereotypes, prejudice, stigma, discrimination and health
3.Social identities and health
S2- Sex, gender and health:
1.The concepts of sex and gender
2. Sex differences in health and disease
3.The influence of gender on health and illness
4.Strategies to combat gender inequities in health
S3-Migrants, ethnic minorities and health:
1.Cultural determinants and health
2.Social representations of health and illness
3.The concept of ethnicity
4. Risk factors in the health of migrants and ethnic minorities
S4 - Aging, ageism and health:
1. Concept of ageism
2. Age differences in health and illness
3.The determinants of ageism
4.Ageism and active aging
S5-Intervention methods at group level
1.Methods for reducing prejudice, stigma and discrimination
2.Methods for promoting positive social identities
3. Skills training for individual and cultural diversity

1) Over the semester evaluation
1. Written group essay (30%)
2. Group Oral presentation (20%)
3. Individual test (50%)
Students are approved if they have more than 9.5 in each evaluation point and a mean of more or equal to 9.5. The students that are not enrolled or that fail the over the semester evaluation may choose to do the evaluation by exam (100%)

Mandatory

Ayalon, L., & Tesch-Römer, C. (2018). Contemporary perspectives on ageism. USA: Springer Nature.
Brannon, L., (2024). Gender: Psychological perspectives (8ª ed.). Routledge
Hassard, J., & Torres, L.D. (2020, Eds.). Aligning perspectives in gender mainstreaming: Gender, health, Safety and Wellbeing
Haslam, C., Jetten, J., Cruwys, T., Dingle, G., & Haslam, S. A. (2018). The new psychology of health: Unlocking the social cure. Routledge.
Marques, S. (2011). Discriminação da terceira idade. Relógio d´Água Editores.
Nelson, T. (ed.). (2017). Ageism: Stereotypes and Prejudice Against Older Persons (2nd Ed.). MIT Press.
Nico, M., & Pollock, G. (2022, Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Inequalities and the Life Course. Routledge International Handbooks
Oliffe, J.L. & Greaves, L. (2012, Eds). Designing and conducting gender and sex and health research. London. SAGE
World Health Organization. (2021). Global report on ageism. World Health Organization.

Optional

Berry, J. W. (2023). Living together in culturally diverse societies. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 64(3), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000362
Chang, E. S., Kannoth, S., Levy, S., Wang, S. Y., Lee, J. E., & Levy, B. R. (2020). Global reach of ageism on older persons? health: A systematic review. PloS one, 15(1), e0220857.
Chu, W., Wippold, G., & Becker, K. D. (2022). A systematic review of cultural competence trainings for mental health providers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 53(4), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000469
Helgeson, V. (2017). Psychology of Gender. London: Routledge
Gurung, R. (2006). Health psychology: a cultural approach. Belmont: Thomsom Huff, R. M., Kline, M. V. & Peterson, D. V. (Eds.) (2014). Health Promotion in Multicultural Populations (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Marques, S. Vauclair, M.L., Rodrigues, R., Mendonça, J., Gerardo, F., Cunha, F. (2015). imAGES: Programa de intervenção de promoção de imagens positivas de envelhecimento em crianças e adolescentes. Lisboa: SCML & Leya Editores.
Marques, S., Mariano, J., Mendonça, J., De Tavernier, W., Hess, M., Naegele, L., ... & Martins, D. (2020). Determinants of ageism against older adults: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2560.
Revenson T. & Gurung, R. A: (2019). Handbook of Health Psychology. New York: Routledge
Sánchez-Lopez, P., & Limiñana-Gras, R. (2016, Eds.). The psychology of gender and health: Conceptual and applied global concerns. Oxford: Academic press
Ussher; J.M., Chrisler, J.C., Perz, Janette (2020). Routledge International Handbook of Women’s Sexual and Reproductive Health. London: Routledge

CP1. The impacts of social relationships on health
1.1. Health, integration, and social interaction. Loneliness and health.
CP2. Psychosocial theoretical models linking health and social relationships
2.1. The emotional pathway
2.2. The social validation pathway
2.3. The social integration pathway
2.4. The attachment pathway
CP3. Stress, coping, and social support.
3.1. Stress and health: definitions, processes, and effects; stress responses and management; assessment and intervention.
3.2. Coping and adaptation: processes, resources, and assessment
3.3. Social support and health: functions of social support, received vs perceived support, measures and interventions.
CP4. Group dynamics in health.
4.1. Group processes in health
4.2. Feedback and communication in the group
4.3. Cohesion and conflict in the group
4.4. Leading groups in health contexts
4.5. Group intervention models

Students can complete the CU through assessment throughout the semester or through an exam.
Assessment throughout the semester includes attendance at least 6 PL classes (3/4) and also (i) an individual written test (50%), (ii) a group assignment on a group intervention to combat loneliness or burnout, with poster discussion (25%), and an assignment on group leadership in health (25%). Students who obtain a minimum grade of 9.5 in each assessment element (and, therefore, a final average equal to or higher than 9.5) and attend at least 3/4 of the PL classes will pass.
Assessment by exam is carried out by means of an individual written exam (100%).

Mandatory

Friedman, H.S. (Ed.) (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Health Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Guerra, M.P., Lima, L., & Torres, S. (2013). Intervir em Grupos na Saúde. Lisboa: Climepsi.

Lima, M.L. (2018). Nós e os outros: o poder dos laços sociais. Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.

Lima, M.L., Marques, S., & Bernardes, S. (2014 e 2016). Psicologia Social da Saúde (volumes 1 e 2). Lisboa: Sílabo

Stroebe, W., & Stroebe, M.S. (1995). Psicologia Social e Saúde. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget.

[PS.120 STR*Soc]

Optional

Relações sociais e saúde

Haslam, C., Jetten, J., Creuwys, T, Dingle, G.A., & Haslam, S.A. (2018). The New Psychology of Health: Unlocking the social cure. London: Routledge.

Jetten, J., Haslam, C., & Haslam, S.A. (2011). The Social Cure: Identity, Health and Well-Being. London: Taylor & Francis. [S.301 Soc,6]

Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2001). Emotion, Social Relationships, and Health. New York: Oxford University Press. [PS.122 Emo,1]

Stress e Coping

Cooper, C. L., & Payne, R. E. (1991). Personality and stress: Individual differences in the stress process. John Wiley & Sons.[ PS.122 Per]

Fink, G. (Ed.). (2016). Stress: Concepts, Cognition, Emotion, and Behavior: Handbook of Stress Series (Vol. 1). Academic Press. [PS.123 FIN*Str]

Folkman, S. (2013). Stress: appraisal and coping. In Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine (pp. 1913-1915). Springer New York.

Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (2004). Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer: New York.[ PS.123 LAZ*Str]

Snyder, C. R. (Ed.). (1999). Coping: The psychology of what works. Clarendon Press.[ PS.123 Cop]

Suedfeld, P. (1997). Handbook of Stress, Medicine, and Health. Boca Raton : CRC Press. [PS.122 Han,2]

Zeidner, M., & Endler, N. S. (Eds.). (1996). Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (Vol. 195). John Wiley & Sons.[PS.122 Han,7]

Suporte Social

Cohen, S., Underwood, L.G., & Gottlieb, B.H. (2000). Social Support Measurement and Intervention: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. New York: Oxford University Press. [S.205 Soc]

Uchino, B. N. (2004). Social support and physical health: Understanding the health consequences of relationships. Yale University Press [PS.131 UCH*Soc]

Dinâmica de grupos

Forsyth, D.R. (1999). Group dynamics. Belmont: Wadsworth . [PS.132 FOR*Gro 6ªed.]

Guerra, M.P., Lima, L., & Torres, S. (2013). Intervir em Grupos na Saúde. Lisboa: Climepsi.

Kurtz, L.F. (1997). Self-help and support groups. A hand-book for practicioners. London: Sage. [PS.132 KUR*Sel]

S1. Introduction to Qualitative Research
1.1. Scope and perspectives in qualitative research

S 2. Techniques for Qualitative Data Analysis
2.1. Discourse analysis and thematic analysis: definitions and procedural steps
2.2. Strengths and limitations of each methodology
2.3. Practical exercises

S 3. Software Tools for Data Coding and Analysis
3.1. Introduction, functionalities, and applications
3.2. Practical exercises using MAXQDA software

S4. Assessment Criteria in Qualitative Psychological Research

S5. Writing and Presenting Findings in Qualitative Research

Continuous assessment: Students are required to attend at least 75% of the sessions and complete the following assessment components: (1) an individual assignment (40%) consisting of a critical analysis of a qualitative scientific article; and (2) a group assignment (50%) involving the application of one of the methodologies to a set of textual data. This group project will be presented in class (10%). Students will pass the course if they obtain a final grade equal to or above 9.5 (on a 20-point scale). A minimum grade of 9.5 is required in each assessment component.

Final assessment: Final exam (100%), in the form of a written assignment. The exam consists of a thematic analysis report, presented in the format of the Methods and Results sections of a scientific article following APA guidelines. The textual material for analysis will be made available on the Moodle platform three days before the exam date.

The teaching staff might require an oral examination (both during continuous or final assessment) as a complementary evaluation method when deemed necessary (e.g., in cases of suspected plagiarism).

Mandatory

Bauer, M. & Gaskell, G. (2000). Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. London: Thousand Oaks.
Braun, V & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A practical guide. London: SAGE
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2014). Successful qualitative research. London: SAGE
Jones, R. (2024). Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
Willig, C., & Rogers, W. S. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. London:Sage.
Woolf, N. & Silver, C. (2017). Qualitative Analysis Using MAXQDA: The Five-Level QDA Method. London: Sage.

Optional

Complimentary references will be given at each class.
Serão fornecidas outras referências (específicas) em cada uma das aulas.
Joffe, H. (2012). Thematic analysis. In D. Harper & A. Thompson, Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health and Psychotherapy (pp. 209-223). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151
Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082
Lyons, E., & Coyle, A. (2007). Analysing qualitative data in psychology. London: Sage.
Style, B. A. (2020). APA 7th Edition Guide. Washington, DC: APA.

PC1:Introduction to a psychosocial approach to chronic illness adaptation
1.1.Chronic diseases: Epidemiology and burden
1.2. Functionality and disability: Conceptualization and measurement
1.3. Adaptation vs. adjustment to chronic illness: basic psychosocial concepts and models
1.4. Assessment of quality of life and adjustment to chronic illness
PC2.Psychosocial assessment and intervention in illness adaptation:
2.1.Clinical and epidemiological characteristics and burden of chronic pain, cancer, cardiovascular, metabolic and infecious diseases.
2.2.Psychosocial assessment and intervention methodologies
PC3: Motivational interviewing in chronic illness contexts
3.1.Basic principles: spirit, motivational focus and communication style
3.2. Skills trainning: questionning, affirmation, reflexion and providing information.

In the assessment throughout the semester, students are expected to perform:
1. A test (50%).
2. An oral group presentation (35%) of a case of chronic illness adaptation, with a proposal for a psychosocial assessment and intervention plan.
3.Motivational interview role-play (individual) (15%)

Students who are not registered or who fail the assessment throughout the semestre will be able to take the CU in a final assessment that will include: an exam (85%) and the role-play of the motivational interview (15%).

Students who, having grades above 9.5 in all assessments, obtain a final average equal to or greater than 9.5 are approved.

Mandatory

Chan, F., Cardoso, E.S., & Chronister, J.A. (2009). Understanding Psychosocial Adjustment to Chronic Illness and Disability: A Handbook for Evidence-based Practitioners in Rehabilitation. NY: Springer.

Dunn, D.S. (2015). The Social Psychology of Disability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kralik, D., Peterson, B., & Coates, V. (2010). Translating Chronic Illness Research Into Practice. Oxford: Wiley.

Larsen, P.D. (2016, Ed.). Lubkin's Chronic Illness: Impact and Interventions (9th Ed.). Burligton: Jones and Bartlett Learning.

Marini, I., & Stebnicki, M. (2012). The Psychological and Social Impact of Illness and Disability (6th ed.). NY: Springer

Morewitz, S. (2006). Chronic Diseases and Health-care: New trends in Diabetes, Arthritis, Osteoporosis, Fibromyalgia, Low-back pain, Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer. New York: Springer.

Rollnick, S., Miller, W., Butler, C.C. (2008). Motivational interviewing in health care: Helping patients change behaviour. London:Guilford Press.

Optional

Bradley, C. (2013, Ed.). Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: A Guide to Psychological Measurement in Diabetes Research and Practice. New York: Psychology Press.
Cordella, M., & Poiani, A. (2014). Behavioural Oncology: Psychological, CoGatchel, R.J., & Turk, D.C. (1999, Ed.). Psychosocial factors mmunicative, and Social Dimensions. New York: Springer.
Gurung, R.A. (2005). Health Psychology: A cultural approach. Belmont, CA: Thomson/ Wadsworth.
Haslam, C., Jetten, J., Cruwys, T., Dingle, G. A., & Haslam, A. (2018). The New Psychology of Health: Unlocking the Social Cure. London: Routledge.
Holland, J. C., Breitbart, W. S., Jacobsen, P. B., Lederberg, M. S., Loscalzo, M. J., & McCorkle, R. S. (2010). Psycho-Oncology (2nd Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
LeFort, S., et al. (2015). Living a Healthy Life with Chronic Pain. Boulder: Bull Publising Company.
Lorig, K. et al. (2012). Living a Healthy Life with Chronic Conditions: Self-management of Heart disease, Arthritis, Diabetes, Depression, Asthma, Bronchitis, Emphysema, and other physical and mental health conditions. Boulder: Bull Publishing.
Major, B., Dovidio, J., & Link, B. (2018, Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Stigma, Discrimination and Health. New York: Springer.
Martz, E., & Livneh, H. (2007). Coping with Chronic Illness and Disability: Theoretical, empirical and clinical aspects. New York: Springer.
Steinberg, M. P. & Miller, W.R. (2015). Motivational interviewing in diabetes care. New York: The Guilford Press.

1. The specificity of psychosocial perspective on health promotion
1.1. Health Promotion: concepts and definitions
1.2. Assumptions
1.3. Evaluation methods and strategies of psychosocial intervention
1.4. Contexts of health promotion

2. Evaluation and intervention in health promotion
2.1. Theoretical principles
2.2. Intervention types
2.3. Evaluation types and design
2.4. Evaluation instruments and indicators:

3. Specific areas of evaluation and intervention
3.1. Healthy lifestyles promotion    
3.2. Sexuality, reproductive and maternal-infant health
3.4. Addictive behaviours
3.5. Screening, vaccination, accidents' prevention and road safety
3.6. Mental health and wellbeing
3.7. Healthy and active ageing

Students can complete the course through assessment throughout the semester or assessment by exam.
Assessment throughout the semester includes: (1) an individual written test (30%); (2) a written group assignment on the critical analysis of a health promotion programme (20%); (3) a group assignment on the creation of digital content aimed at health education (e.g. podcast episode; 20%); and (4) a group assignment on the simulated implementation of a health promotion programme and its formative evaluation, involving the submission of a final written document (30%). Students with a final average of 9.5 or more will be approved.
Assessment by exam is carried out through an individual written exam (100 per cent). Students who obtain a final mark of at least 9.5 will be approved.

Mandatory

Bennet, P., & Murphy, S. (1999). Psicologia e promoção da saúde. Climepsi.
Cragg, L., Davies, M., & Macdowall, W. (eds.). (2013). Health promotion theory (2nd ed). McGraw-Hill Education.
Fertman, C. I., & Grim, M. (eds.). (2022). Health promotion programs: From theory to practice (3rd ed). Society for Public Health Education.
Harris, M.J. (2010). Evaluating Public and Community Health Programs. Jossey-Bass.
McKenzie, J. F., Neiger, B. L., & Thackeray, R. (2017). Planning, implementing, and evaluating health promotion programs: A primer (7th ed). Pearson.
Nutland, W., & Cragg, L. (eds.). (2015). Health Promotion Practice (2nd ed). Open University Press.
Snelling, A. M. (ed). (2014). Introduction to health promotion. Josey-Bass.
Stephens, C. (2008). Health Promotion: A Psychosocial Approach. Open University Press.

Optional

Bartholomew, L. K. (2011). Planning health promotion programs: An intervention mapping approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Baum, A., Revenson, T.A., & Singer, J. (2012). Handbook of health psychology (2nd ed). Psychology Press.
Bennet, P. (2000). Introduction to clinical health psychology. Open University Press.
Conner, M., & Armitage, C.J. (2002). The social psychology of food. Open University Press.
DiClemente R. J., Crosby R. A., Kegler M. (2009). Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research (2nd ed). Jossey-Bass.
Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (2009). Envejecimiento activo: Contribuciones de la psicologia. Ediciones Pirâmide.
Friedman, H.S. (Ed) (2011). The Oxford handbook of health psychology. Oxford University Press.
Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., & Viswanath, K. (2008). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass.
Katz, M.H. (2010). Evaluating clinical and public health interventions: A practical guide to study design and statistics. Cambridge University Press.
OCDE/Observatório Europeu dos Sistemas e Políticas de Saúde (2021), Portugal: Perfil de Saúde do País 2021, Estado da Saúde na UE, OCDE, Paris/Observatório Europeu dos Sistemas e Políticas de Saúde, Bruxelas.
Ogden, J. (2023). Health psychology: A textbook (7th ed). McGraw Hill.
Ollhoff, J., & Ollhoff, L. (2004). Getting along: Teaching social skills to children and youth. Sparrow Media Group.
Wolfe, D. Et al (1996). The youth relationships manual: A group approach with adolescents for the prevention of woman abuse and the promotion of healthy relationships. Sage.
Miller, W.R., & Rollnick, S. (2012). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (Applications of motivational interviewing) (3th ed). The Guilford Press.
Rosengren, D.B. (2009). Building motivational interviewing skills: A practitioner workbook. New York: Guilford Press.

Bibliografia adicional será indicada ao longo do semestre.

CP1 – Community Psychology: Concepts and theoretical approaches
• Origin, justification and current status of Community Psychology
• Definition, characteristics, principles and values ??of Community Psychology
• Concepts and formulations of Community
• Ecology, prevention and promotion
CP2 – Community research and evaluation
• Concepts and processes of community research and evaluation
• Participatory and collaborative research
CP3 – Community intervention
• Concepts, processes and strategies for community intervention
• Sense of community and social support
• Community development and participation, well-being and empowerment
• Community partnerships and coalitions
• Effectiveness of interventions
• Ethics in community intervention

Students can complete the UC through assessment throughout the semester or assessment by exam.
Assessment throughout the semester includes the following assessment instruments: oral presentation of a group work (25%), a written report of the group work (25%) and an individual written test (50%). All assessment instruments must have a minimum score of 9.5.
The exam assessment method consists of an individual written exam (100%) in the defined assessment periods (1st and/or 2nd period and/or special period).

Mandatory

Bond, Serrano-García, Keys & Shinn (2017). APA handbook of community psychology: Theoretical foundations, core concepts, and emerging challenges. APA
Burns, Howard & Ospina (Eds) (2021). The SAGE handbook of participatory research and inquiry. Sage
Fisher, Sonn, & Bishop (Eds) (2002). Psychological sense of community. Kluwer Academic
Jason, Keys, Suarez-Balcazar, Taylor, & Davis (Eds) (2004). Participatory community research. APA
Kloos, Hill, Thomas, Wandersman, Elias, & Dalton (2013). Community Psychology: Linking individuals and communities (3rd ed). Cengage
Minkler & Wallerstein (Eds) (2008). Community-based participatory research for health: from process to outcomes (2nd ed). John Wiley
Nelson & Prilleltensky (2005). Community Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ornelas (2008). Psicologia Comunitária. Lisboa: Fim de Século
Rappaport & Seidman (2000). Handbook of community psychology. Plenum
Scott & Wolfe (2015). Community psychology: foundations for practice. Sage

Optional

S1. Basic notions in program/project planning and evaluation.
1.1. Definition of project and program
1.2. Phases in program planning
S2. Project opportunity and problem
2.1 Identification of opportunities
2.2 Strategies for problem definition,definition by the client, analysis of social indicators, assessment of needs
S3. The importance of applying theories to design and evaluation.
3.1 Conceptualization of the problem and theoretical rationale
3.2 Result variable
3.3 Development of process models: a review
3.4 Table of balance
S4.Tools and techniques
4.1 Definition and components of Logic Model (LM)
4.2 Approaches to build the LM
4.3 Phases of the LM
S5.Activities associated with LM
5.1 Objectives and hypotheses
5.2 Channels, methods, strategies
S6. Evaluation of projects
6.1 Types of evaluation
6.2 Design and assessment tools
S7. Design and evaluation of specific projects

In the over the period evaluation option, students are required to take part in two types of evaluation exercises:
One individual test evaluating the topics covered in classes (30%)
A workgroup (program design/free theme) that includes a follow-up report (70%).
Students are approved if they reach at least 9.5 both in the test and in the work group.
Those students who fail the over the period evaluation have the choice to do an individual exam (100%).

Mandatory

Braverman, M. (2023). Evaluating program effectiveness : validity and decision-making in outcome evaluation . SAGE
Buunk, A. P. (2021). Applying social psychology: From problems to solutions. SAGE
Eldredge, L. K. B., Markham, C. M., Ruiter, R. A., Fernandez, M. E., Kok, G., & Parcel, G. S. (2016). Planning health promotion programs: an internvention mapping approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Kok, G., Gottlieb, N. H., Peters, G. J. Y., Mullen, P. D., Parcel, G. S., Ruiter, R. A. C., … Bartholomew, L. K. (2015). A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach. Health Psychology Review, 10(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155
Newcomer, K. E., Hatry, H. P., & Wholey, J. S. (2015). Handbook of practical program evaluation. John Wiley & Sons

Optional

"Fawcett, S.B., Francisco, V.T., Schultz, J.A., Berkowitz, B., Wolff, T.J., & Nagy, G. (2000). The Community Tool Box: A Web-based resource for building healthier communities. Public Health Reports, 115(2&3), 274-278 Giancola, S. P. (2021). Program evaluation: Embedding evaluation into program design and dvelopment. Sage Publications. Harris, M. J. (2017). Evaluating public and community health programs. John Wiley & Sons. Marques, S. Vauclair, M.L., Rodrigues, R., Mendonça, J., Gerardo, F., Cunha, F. (2015). imAGES: Programa de intervenção de promoção de imagens positivas de envelhecimento em crianças e adolescentes. Lisboa: SCML & Leya Editores. Marques, S., Vauclair, Rodrigues, R., C.M., Mendonça, J., Gerardo, F. & Cunha, F. (2017). imAGES: intervention program to prevent ageism in children and adolescents. In Baker, H.E., Krueger, T.M. & Karasik, R.J. (Eds). A Hands-on approach to teaching about ageing (pp. 24-30). Springer Publishing Company. McKenzie, J. F., Neiger, B. L., & Thackeray, R. (2022). Planning, implementing and evaluating health promotion programs. Jones & Bartlett Learning. Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., ... & Wood, C. E. (2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of behavioral medicine, 46(1), 81-95. Ruiter, R. A., Massar, K., van Vugt, M., & Kok, G. (2012). Applying social psychology to understanding social problems. Social psychology of social problems: The intergroup context, 337-362. Thomas, V. G., & Campbell, P. B. (2020). Evaluation in today’s world: Respecting diversity, improving quality, and promoting usability. Sage Publications. Westland, J. (2006). The project management life cycle: a complete step-by-step methodology for initiating, planning, executing & closing a project successfully. Kogan Page Limited.