PC1. Steps and processes for designing a research project: Structure, development stages, and norms for the elaboration of a research project;
PC2. Literature Review: Goals and features of a literature review; Literature review and the development of the argument; Planning and conducting a literature review
PC3. Outlining the methodological strategy:
Understanding the link between conceptual and operationalization stages; Research design; planning data analysis; ethical issues in research;
PC4: Analyzing and presenting the results, discussion, and conclusions; references and appendices.
PC5: Preparing the public defense.

The collective seminars aim to prepare students for the final writing and public defense of their research work, but the completion of the seminar classes does not directly include these final stages. They are designed to ensure that students are prepared and equipped with the knowledge, skills, competencies, and confidence to present and defend their project work publicly. Since attendance at seminars is crucial for the development of the project, the jury will be provided with information about the student's involvement as an additional element to contextualize the final evaluation.
The research project must be presented according to the standards and within the deadlines established by Iscte and is defended in public where the technical components, the written work, and the presentation and defense are evaluated. The final evaluation occurs after the public discussion of the research project and subsequent evaluation.

Mandatory

APA. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA
Bishop, D.V. & Thompson, P.A. (2024). Evaluating What works: An Intuitive Guide to Intervention Research for Practitioners. CRC Press. Available online: https://bookdown.org/dorothy_bishop/Evaluating-What-Works/)
Clark et al. (2019). How to do your social research project or dissertation. Oxford University Press.
Heard, S. B. (2021). The scientist's guide to writing: How to write more easily and effectively throughout your scientific career (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Pennington, C. (2023). A student’s guide to Open Science: Using the replication crisis to reform psychology. Open University Press.
Wholey, J. S., Hatry, R. P., & Newcomer, K. E. (2010). Handbook of practical program evaluation. Jossey-Bass.
Royse, D., Thyer, B. A., Padgett, D. K. (2010). Program evaluation: an introduction. Belmont: Wadsworth.

Optional

Ridley, D. (2008). The literature review: a step-by-step guide for students. Sage. Reis, H.T., & Judd, C. (2000, eds.). Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge University Press. Punch, K.F. (2006). Developing effective research proposals. SAGE. Mohrman, S. A. & Lawler III, E. E. (2011). Useful research: advancing theory and practice. Berret-Koehler Publishers. Garrido, M. V. & Prada, M. (Eds.) Manual de competências académicas (pp. 245-280). Sílabo. Hailman, J. P., & Strier B. (2006). Planning, proposing, and presenting science effectively: a guide for graduate students and researchers in the behavioral sciences and biology. Cambridge University Press. Friedland, A., J., & Folt, C. L. (2009). Writing successful science proposals (2ª ed.). Yale University Press Walliman, N. (2005). Your research project. SAGE.

PC1. Steps and processes for designing a research project: Structure, development stages, and norms for the elaboration of a research project;
PC2. Literature Review: Goals and features of a literature review; Literature review and the development of the argument; Planning and conducting a literature review
PC3. Outlining the methodological strategy:
Understanding the link between conceptual and operationalization stages; Research design; planning data analysis; ethical issues in research;
PC4: Analyzing and presenting the results, discussion, and conclusions; references and appendices.
PC5: Preparing the public defense of the dissertation.

The collective seminars aim to prepare students for the final writing and public defense of their dissertations, but the completion of the seminar classes does not directly include these final stages. They are designed to ensure that students are prepared and equipped with the knowledge, skills, competencies, and confidence to present and defend their dissertatiion publicly. Since attendance at seminars is crucial for the development of the project, the jury will be provided with information about the student's involvement as an additional element to contextualize the final evaluation.
The dissertation must be presented according to the standards and within the deadlines established by Iscte and is defended in public where the technical components, the written work, and the presentation and defense are evaluated. The final evaluation occurs after the public discussion of the dissertation and subsequent evaluation.

Mandatory

APA. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA
Bishop, D.V. & Thompson, P.A. (2024). Evaluating What works: An Intuitive Guide to Intervention Research for Practitioners. CRC Press. Available online: https://bookdown.org/dorothy_bishop/Evaluating-What-Works/)
Bui, Yvonne N. (2014). How to write a master's thesis (2nd ed). Sage.
Clark et al. (2019). How to do your social research project OR dissertation. Oxford University Press.
Harrison & Rentzelas (2021). Your psychology dissertation. Sage.
Heard, S. B. (2021). The scientist's guide to writing: How to write more easily and effectively throughout your scientific career (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Pennington, C. (2023). A student’s guide to Open Science: Using the replication crisis to reform psychology. Open University Press.

Optional

Swetnam, D. (2000). Writing your dissertation: How to plan, prepare and present successful work. How to books. Ridley, D. (2008). The literature review: a step-by-step guide for students. Sage. Reis, H.T., & Judd, C. (2000, eds.). Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge University Press. Punch, K.F. (2006). Developing effective research proposals. SAGE. Mohrman, S. A. & Lawler III, E. E. (2011). Useful research: advancing theory and practice. Berret-Koehler Publishers. Garrido, M. V. & Prada, M. (Eds.) Manual de competências académicas (pp. 245-280). Sílabo. Hailman, J. P., & Strier B. (2006). Planning, proposing, and presenting science effectively: a guide for graduate students and researchers in the behavioral sciences and biology. Cambridge University Press. Friedland, A., J., & Folt, C. L. (2009). Writing successful science proposals (2ª ed.). Yale University Press Fleming, R. S., & Kowalsky, M. (2021). Survival Skills for Thesis and Dissertation Candidates. Springer International Publishing. Walliman, N. (2005). Your research project. SAGE.

PC1. Emotions and other affective states. Emotions as biological adaptations resulting from evolutionary mechanisms
PC2. Basic concepts in evolution and genetics
PC3. The evolution of the vertebrates' nervous system and the evolution of behavior and emotion; the emotion-behavior relationship
PC4. The relation between brain structures, neurotransmitters and emotional states
PC5. Methods and techniques to study the biological underpinnings of emotion. The role of neuroscience and comparative psychology
PC6. The concept of primary emotional systems
PC7. Neurobiological bases of attachment and love. Relationship between behaviour and the chemistry of affect. Similarities and differences between affective dependence and chemical addiction
PC8. Empathy and its role in bonding
PC9. The contribution of new findings on the biological bases of emotion to domains such as development, health and work

Students are given a choice between two evaluation schemes: throughout the semester or exam.

Evaluation throughout the semester comprises a test (60%) and an essay in small groups + oral in-class oral presentation (40%). To be approved, students need to obtain >= 8.5 in each of the evaluation components, and a final weighted average >= 9.5

Exam (100%). This evaluation is available to students who choose it and to those who have not passed the evaluation throughout the semester. Students will pass if they achieve a minimum score of 9.5.

Mandatory

Tang, Y., Hoelzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 213-225
Pina, M. & Gonthier, N. (2014). The Evolution of social communication in primates. Interdisciplinary evolution research. New York: Springer.
Panksepp, J. (2011). The basic emotional circuits of mammalian brains: Do animals have affective lives? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1791-1804.
LeDoux, J. (2012). Rethinking the emotional brain. Neuron, 73, 653-676.
Dalgleish, T. (2004). The emotional brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 582-589.
Buss, D. (2014). Comment: evolutionary criteria for considering an emotion "Basic": Jealousy as an illustration. Emotion Review, 6, 1-3.
Bernhardt, B. C., & Singer, T. (2012). The neural basis of empathy. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 1-23.
Barrett, L.F., Lewis, M., & Haviland-Jones (2018). Handbook of emotions (Fourth Edition). New York: The Guilford Press.

Optional

Serão disponibilizados outros artigos por tema/aula aos estudantes
Zimmer, C. (2003). Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea: from Darwin to DNA. New South Wales: Arrow Books
Rizzolati, G. Fogassi, L. & Galese, V (2006). Mirrors in the Mind. Scientific American, 54-61
Pessoa, L. (2010). Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a 'low road' to 'many roads' of evaluating biological significance. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 773-782.
Panksepp, J. (2005). Affective consciousness: Core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Consciousness and Cognition, 14 (1), 30-80.
Panksepp, J. (2004). Affective Neuroscience. The Foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lockwood, P. (2016). The anatomy of empathy: Vicarious experience and disorders of social cognition. Behavioural Brain Research, 311, 255-266.
Kinsley, C.H. & Lambert, K.G. (2006). The Maternal Brain. Scientific American, 72-79.
Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, Empathy, and Mirror Neurons. Annual Review of Psycholgy, 60, 653-70.
Fox, K., Nijeboer, S., Dixon, M. L., Floman, J. L., Ellamil, M., Rumak, S. P., Sedlmeier, P., & Christoff, K. (2014). Is meditation associated with altered brain structure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of morphometric neuroimaging in meditation practitioners. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 43, 48-73.

1. Systematisation of a statistics glossary
2. Exploratory data analysis
2.1 Descriptive measures of location, symmetry and dispersion.
2.2 Graphical representations
2.3 Composite variables
2.4 Operationalisation with statistical software
3. modelling to compare two groups
3.1 Cross-tabulations
3.2 Chi-square test
3.3 Tests for equality of means
3.4 Operationalisation with statistical software
4.Validating the relationship between pairs of variables
4.1 Categorised variables
4.2.Ordinal and quantitative variables
4.3 Quantitative variables
4.4 Operationalisation with statistical software.

There are two assessment modalities:
1. Assessment during the semester:
a) Group project to be submitted at the end of the semester, with discussion (40%); minimum grade: 10 points.
The project consists of preparing a data analysis report, applying the syllabus contents, based on a database provided by the teaching team.
b) Written test (65%). Minimum grade: 7 points.
1. Exam assessment
a) Written test (65%). minimum grade: 7 points.
b) Data analysis report (35%). Minimum grade: 10 points

Mandatory

Laureano, R. M. S., & Botelho, M. C. (2017). SPSS. O meu manual de consulta rápida (3ª ed.). Edições Sílabo.
Maroco, J. (2021). Análise Estatística com o SPSS (8ª edição). Report Number.

Optional

Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Maroco, J., & Bispo, R. (2003). Estatística aplicada às ciências sociais e humanas. Climepsi Editores.
Reis, Elizabeth (2008). Estatística Descritiva (7ª ed). Edições Sílabo.

PC1: Definitions of Emotion and Components of Emotions.
PC2: Structure and Classification of Emotions: Theoretical assumptions of categorical and dimensional models.
PC3: Methods and techniques for measuring emotions and other affective processes: Advantages and limitations.
PC4: Procedures and techniques for inducing emotions.
PC5: Functions of emotions.
PC6: Assumptions of evolutionary, psychological, and social constructivist approaches regarding the universality, the variability, and the importance of context and culture in studying emotions.
PC7: Assumptions of theoretical approaches on the course of the emotional experience.

Students may complete this Course Unit through continuous assessment during the semester or through a final evaluation:
A. Continuous Assessment includes the following mandatory elements:
(1) Development of a group project with an oral presentation in class (15%); (2) individual exercises throughout the semester as set by the instructor(s) (15%); and (3) an individual written test (70%). Students will pass if they achieve a minimum score of 9 in each evaluation element and a minimum final average of 9.5.
B. Final Evaluation via an individual written exam (100%) covering the entire course material. This evaluation is available to students who choose it and to those who have not passed the continuous evaluation. Students will pass if they achieve a minimum score of 9.5.
There are no minimum attendance requirements for completing this CU.

Mandatory

Scarantino, A. (2024). Emotion Theory: The Routledge Comprehensive Guide.
Shiota, M. N., & Kalat, J. W. (2012). Emotion (2nd Ed). Belmont: Wadsworth.
Damásio, A. R. (2000). O erro de Descartes. Emoção, razão e cérebro humano. Publicações Europa América.
A complementar estes livros são partilhados online (moodle) artigos clássicos e referências atuais de teorias e investigação no domínio das conteúdos da UC (incluindo publicações do/as docentes) .

Optional

Evers et al. (2014). Emotion response coherence: A dual-process perspective. Biological Psychology, 98, 43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.003 Tsai, J.L. & Clobert, M. (2019). Cultural influences on emotion: Empirical patterns and emerging trends. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds). Handbook of Cultural Psychology. Oxford University Press. Coles, et al. (2019). A meta-analysis of the facial feedback literature: Effects of facial feedback on emotional experience are small and variable. Psychological Bulletin, 145(6), 610-651. Santos, A. C., Arriaga, P., & Simões, C. (2021). Catching the audience in a job interview: Effects of emotion regulation strategies on subjective, physiological, and behavioural responses. Biological Psychology, 162, 108089 Wang, K., (...) Arriaga, P., Santos, A. (...) et al. (2021). A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 5 (8), 1089–1110. Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145-172. Zickfeld, D. H., Schubert, T. W., Seibt, B., Blomster, J. K., Arriaga, P., et al. (2019). Kama Muta: Conceptualizing and measuring the experience of being moved across 19 nations and 15 languages. Emotion, 19 (3), 402-424.

CP1: Planning a research project
1.1 The research process
1.2 Types of literature, sources of information and bibliometric indicators.
1.3 Research ethics.
1.4. The research problem.
1.5. The research question.
1.6. Formulating hypotheses.
1.7 Methodological options
1.8. Variables: operationalization and manipulation of concepts
1.9 Analysis of research quality

CP2: Writing research projects and reports
2.1 Writing standards in research.
2.2 Formal sections of a research project and report.

Students can complete the course through assessment throughout the semester or assessment by exam.
Assessment throughout the semester includes i) practical group work consisting of a written research project (25%), ii) an oral presentation of the work (15%) and iii) an individual written test (60%). Students with a minimum mark in each assessment element of at least 9.5 (and therefore a final average of 9.5 or more) will pass.
Assessment by exam is carried out through an individual written exam (100%).

Mandatory

APA. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
Arriaga, P. & Sales, C. (2016). Como Planear a Investigação? In Garrido & Prada, Manual de competências académicas (pp. 199-233). Lisboa: Sílabo.
Garrido, M. V. & Prada, M. (Eds.) Manual de competências académicas (pp. 245-280). Sílabo.
LeBel, E. et al. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389-402.
McBride, D. M. (2020). The process of research in psychology (4th ed). Sage.
Prada, M., Camilo, C., Garrido, M. V. & Rodrigues, D. L. (2021). O diabo está nos pormenores: Introdução às normas para escrita científica da American Psychological Association (7ª edição). Psicologia. 35 (1), 95-146.

Optional

All European Academies. (2017). The European code of conduct for research integrity. (Rev. ed.). Berlin, Germany: ALLEA.
Belter, C. W. (2015). Bibliometric indicators: opportunities and limits. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(4), 219-221.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fleming, R. S., & Kowalsky, M. (2021). Survival skills for thesis and dissertation candidates. Springer International Publishing.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.
Prada, M., Camilo, C., Garrido, M. V. & Rodrigues, D. L. (2021). O diabo está nos pormenores: Introdução às normas para escrita científica da American Psychological Association (7ª edição). Psicologia. 35 (1), 95-146.

Grant, S., Mayo-Wilson, E., Melendez-Torres, G., & Montgomery, P. (2013). Reporting quality of social and psychological intervention trials: A systematic review of reporting guidelines and trial publications. PLoS One, 8(5), e65442.
Helgesson, G., & Eriksson, S. (2019). Authorship order. Learned Publishing, 32(2), 106-112.
Marôco, J. (2018). Análise estatística com o SPSS statistics (7ª ed.). Lisboa: ReportNumber.
Nosek, B. A. et al. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceed of the Nat Acad of Sciences, 115(11), 2600-2606.
Prada, M., Camilo, C., Garrido, M. V. & Rodrigues, D. L. (2021). O diabo está nos pormenores: Introdução às normas para escrita científica da American Psychological Association (7ª edição). Psicologia. 35 (1), 95-146.
Petursdottir, A. I., & Carr, J. E. (2018). Applying the taxonomy of validity threats from mainstream research design to single-case experiments in applied behavior analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 11(3), 228-240.

PC 1. The development of research ideas and the basics of the research process.
PC 2. Advantages and methodological limitations associated with the choice of different types of studies.
PC3. Preparation and implementation of a research study.
PC 4. Strategies of data analysis and presentation of research findings.
PC 5. Dissemination and publication process: Structure of different scientific articles, preparation, submission, and review of an article for publication, and development of scientific posters.

Students can take this course by assessment during the semester or by final exam. To pass the course under the regime of assessment during the semester, they must:
1) Present all the work required in this course (a research project carried out in groups and presented in the form of a poster and a short scientific article carried out individually summarizing the research); 2) Be present at the Theoretical-Practical classes (students may miss a maximum of 3 Theoretical-Practical classes) and at least 50% of the Laboratory Practices.
Under the regime of assessment during the semester, students will be subject to 3 forms of assessment: 1) a group assignment on a piece of research carried out during the semester presented in poster format (50%); 2) an individual paper on the research carried out during the semester, presented in the form of a short research note (45%); 3) participation in LAPSO studies (1h30 in the SPI system) (5%). Participation in LAPSO studies is voluntary and can be replaced by another assignment.
Students with a final average of 9.5 or more in all the assessments will pass.
Students who are not enrolled in the assessment during the semester may use the final exam assessment system. Under the final exam system, students must present individually the same work assignments required in the evaluation through the semester but are exempt from attending theoretical-practical classes and laboratory practices.
Students who fail the assessment in the 1st period or intend to improve their grades can keep the best evaluation scores of the work assignments carried out during the semester and will be asked to conduct a new empirical study to be agreed with the lecturer (and to be handed until the date of the exam for the 2nd period), with the submission of the research report and the oral defense on a date and time to be agreed.

Mandatory

Dunn, P. K. (2024). Scientific Research and Methodology: An introduction to quantitative research in science and health. https://bookdown.org/pkaldunn/SRM-Textbook

Ray, W. J. (2022). Research methods for psychological science. Thousand Oaks : Sage.

Heard, S. B. (2021). The scientist's guide to writing: How to write more easily and effectively throughout your scientific career (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

Harrison, E., & Rentzelas, P. (2021). Your psychology dissertation. Sage.

Guidelines for researchers on personal data protection https://iscte-iul.pt/assets/files/2022/12/12/1670862287212_guidelines_for_researchers_on_personal_data_protection.pdf

Prada, M. & Garrido, M.V. (2013) Conhecer as regras do jogo: Uma introdução as normas para escrita científica da American Psychological Association. Psicologia, 27, 2, 107-143

American Psychological Association (2019). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Optional

Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (2003). Análise de dados em ciências sociais. Introdução às técnicas utilizando o SPSS para windows (3ª Ed.). Oeiras: Celta.

Fiske, S.T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.) (2010). The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. I, pp. 51-139). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.

Reis, H., & Judd, C. (2014). Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. (2nd Ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.) (2019). Guide to publishing in psychology journals (2nd Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bibliografia específica será recomendada nas aulas teórico-práticas a decorrer durante o semestre e nos encontros tutoriais com os investigadores.

1. Definitions and assumptions regarding the cognition-emotion debate
1.1. Cognition: notions of cognitive representation and of information processing; overview of cognitive functions
1.2. Emotion and related concepts
1.3. Historical and philosophical aspects of the cognition-emotion debate
1.4. Methodological approaches to the study of cognition-emotion interactions
2. The influence of emotion on cognition
2.1. Judgment, decision-making and processing modes
2.2. Attention and cognitive control
2.3. Memory
2.4. Language
2.5. Emotional traits and cognitive performance
2.6. Affective disorders
3. The influence of cognition on emotion
3.1. Cognitive processes and emotion regulation
3.2. Impact of cognitive disorders on emotion
4. Integration of cognitive and emotional processes: interactions in the brain

Assessment throughout the semester: Group assignment, including the discussion of a paper and a written report on the topic (40%); test (60%). Students will get approval if they achieve at least 9.5 points in each of the evaluation elements.

Students who fail or miss evaluation throughout the semester are eligible for the exam (100%). They will be approved if their grade is >= 9.5.

Mandatory

Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2020)Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook (8th Edition). Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group
Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. (2007). On the interdependence of cognition and emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1212-1237
Power, M. J., Dagleish, T. (Eds., 2016). Handbook of cognition and emotion: From order to disorder (Third Edition). London: Psychology Press
Pessoa, L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 148-158.
Okon-Singer, H., Hendler, T., Pessoa, L., & Shackman, A. (2015). The neurobiology of emotion?cognition interactions: fundamental questions and strategies for future research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 58.
Ochsner, K. N., & Phelps, E. (2007). Emerging perspectives on emotion-cognition interactions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,11(8), 317-318.
Duncan, S., & Barrett, L. F. (2007). Affect is a form of cognition: A neurobiological analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1184-1211.

Optional

·

The UC contents are distributed across the following Program Contents (CP1-CP10):
CP1. Relationship between phylogenesis and ontogenesis. Epigenesis.
CP2. Early experience and development of the brain and behavior.
CP3. Emotional development in relationships between children and caregivers and between peers.
CP4. The relationship between emotion, morality and prosociality.
CP5. Development of knowledge, recognition and comprehension of emotions.
CP6. Development of expression of emotions.
CP7. Development of emotional regulation.
CP8. Bullying and promoting emotional development in a school context.
CP9. Social and emotional learning and technology.

Students can complete the UC through assessment throughout the semester or assessment by exam.
Assessment throughout the semester includes the following assessment instruments: oral presentation and discussion of a group work (40%, with individual assessment), a written report of the group work (20%) and an individual written test (40%). All assessment instruments must have a minimum score of 9.5.
The exam assessment method consists of an individual written exam (100%) in the defined assessment periods (1st and/or 2nd period and/or special period).

Mandatory

Barrett, L. Lewis, M. & Haviland-Jones, J. (Eds) (2016). Handbook of emotions (4th ed). Guilford Press
Crockett, L., Carlo, G. & Schulenberg, J. (Eds.) (2023). APA handbook of adolescent and young adult development. APA
Davies, D. (2011). Child development. A practitioner's Guide. Guilford Press
Demetriou, H. (2018). Empathy, emotion and education. Palgrave
De Haan, M & Johnson, M. (2003). The cognitive neuroscience of development. Psychology Press
Gross. J. (Ed) (2014). Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed). Guildford Press
Manstead. A. (Ed) (2008). Psychology of emotions. Sage
Nadel , J. & Muir, D. (2009). Emotional development: Recent research advances. Oxford University Press
Pekrun, R. & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (Ed) (2014). International handbook of emotions in education. Routledge
Prinz, J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. Oxford University Press
Tettegah, S., & Huang, W. (Eds) (2016). Emotions, technology, and digital games. Elsevier

Optional

Carvalhosa, S. F. (2010). Prevenção da violência e do bullying em contexto escolar. Climepsi Editores.
Cowie, H. & Berdondini, L. (2002). The expression of emotion in response to bullying. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 7(4), 207-214.
Eisenberg, N. & Mussen, P.H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge University Press.
Gaspar, A. & Esteves, F (2012). Preschoolers faces in spontaneous emotional contexts - how well do they match adult facial expression prototypes? International Journal of Behavioral Development. 36(5), 348-357.
Gerhardt, S. (2009). Why love matters. How affection shapes a baby's brain. Routledge.
Harris M. (2008). Exploring child development: Understanding theory and methods. Sage.
Hopkins, B., Barr, R.G., Michel, G., & Rochat, P. (2005). The Cambridge encyclopedia of child development. Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, K. (2000). Developmental psychology: How nature and nurture interact. Lawrence Earlbaum.
Saarni, C. & Harris, P.L. (1991). Children's understanding of emotion. Cambridge University Press.
Schore, A.N. (2001). Effects of secure attachment relationship on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22(1-2), 7-66.
Smith, P.K. & Hart, C.H. (2006). Childhood social development (2nd ed). Blackwell Publishing
Stroufe, A. (1997). Emotional development: The organization of emotional life in the early years. Cambridge University Press.
Tettegah, S., & Espelage, D. (Eds) (2016). Emotions, technology, and behaviors. Elsevier.
Tettegah, S., & McCreery, M. (Eds) (2016). Emotions, technology, and learning. Amsterdam : Elsevier .
Serão disponibilizados outros artigos por tema/aula.

PC1. Introduction to psychophysiology for the study of emotions: Conceptual, theoretical, and methodological issues in the study of emotions; the context of psychophysiological assessment.
PC2. The nervous system (peripheral e central) and Measurement of its Activity.
PC3. Applied Psychophysiology.

Students may complete this Course Unit through continuous evaluation during the semester or through a final evaluation:
A. Continuous Assessment includes the following mandatory elements:
(1) Development of a group project with an oral presentation in class (15%); (2) individual exercises throughout the semester as set by the instructor (15%); and (3) an individual written test (70%). Students will pass if they achieve a minimum score of 9 in each evaluation element and a minimum final average of 9.5.
B. Final Evaluation via an individual written exam (100%) covering the entire course material. This evaluation is available to students who choose it and to those who have not passed the continuous evaluation. Students will pass if they achieve a minimum score of 9.5.
There are no minimum attendance requirements for completing this CU.

Mandatory

Society for Psychophysiological Research (https://sprweb.org/page/Guidelines_Papers) has articles with Guidelines for specific neurophysiological measures (e.g., EEG/ERP, Pupil/Eye, Cardiovascular, Respiration, Electrodermal, Electromyography).

Cacioppo et al. (2017). Handbook of psychophysiology.
Holmqvist & Andersson (2017). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures.
Correia, Martins et al. (2019). Resting-state connectivity reveals a role for sensorimotor systems in vocal emotional processing in children. NeuroImage, 201, 116052.
Santos, Arriaga & Simões (2021). Effects of emotion regulation strategies on subjective, physiological, and behavioural responses. Biological Psychology, 162, 108089.
Arriaga, P. et al. (2015). Effects of playing a violent video game on pupillary dilation to victims and on aggressive behavior. Psychology of Violence, 5 (2), 199-208.
Zickfeld, Arriaga et al. (2020). Physiological correlates of Kama Muta. Psychophysiology, 57, e13662.

Optional

Arriaga, P., Esteves, F., & Feddes, A., Looking at the (mis)fortunate of others while listening to music., 2014, Arriaga, P., et al., (2014). Looking at the (mis)fortunate of others while listening to music. Psychology of Music, 42 (2), 251-268., https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/handle/10071/7716
Lima, C., Arriaga, P., et al., (2021) Authentic and posed emotional vocalizations trigger distinct facial responses, Cortex, 141, 280-292., https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/handle/10071/22796
Stemmler, G. (2009). Methodological considerations in the psychophysiological study of emotion. In R. Davidson, K. Scherer, & H. Goldsmith, Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 225-255). Oxford University Press.
De Beeck, H. O., & Nakatani, C. (2019). Introduction to human neuroimaging. Cambridge University Press.