In the beginning of this curricular unit, students will be prompted to choose a personal interest topic, which is relevant for the state of the art, as well as a supervisor. With the supervisor, students will:
- Formulate the starting question
- Identify the relevant literature and elaborate a theoretical and empirical revision
- Formulate the research problem and the hypotheses
- Design a study to test the hypotheses
- Create a procedure and the materials
- Carry out the study
- Analyse and interpret the results
- Elaborate the dissertation plan
- Write the dissertation
Throughout this process students will receive important information for the theme of their dissertations and for the conduction of the process itself, as, for example, literature that is relevant for their topic and indications on the design they should use.

The dissertation will be assessed by a panel of judges in public tests, after the supervisor's approval of its conclusion and quality to be presented in public tests. Assessment will be based on the scientific merit of the study and on its theoretical and methodological adequacy.

Mandatory

Smith, Catherine (2010), Writing Public Policy, New York, Oxford University Press.

Moran, M, Martin Rein, e Robert Goodin (2008), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Kraft, Michael E., e Scott R. Furlong (2010), Public Policy. Politics, Analysis, and Alternatives, Washington DC, CQPress,

Kingdon, John W. (2003), Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, New York, Longman.

ISCTE (2008), Normas orientadoras para a dissertação ou trabalho de Projecto de Mestrado.

Dye, Thomas R. (2010), Understanding Public Policy, Boston, Longman.

Dror, Yehezkel (2006), ?Training for Policy Makers? in The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Ed by Michael Moran, Martin Rein, Robert Goodin, Oxford University Press.

Bransford, John (2010), How People Learn. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Bardach, Eugene (2009), A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis, Washington DC, CQPress.

Optional

In the beginning of this curricular unit, students will be prompted to choose a personal interest topic, which is relevant for the state of the art, as well as a supervisor. With the supervisor, students will:
- Identify/select a problem in the public policy domain in need of intervention
- Formulate the research problem based on the chosen problem
- Identify the relevant literature and elaborate a theoretical/empirical revision
- Formulate hypotheses
- Design an intervention
- Prepare materials
- Carry out the programme
- Analyse and interpret the results
- Assess the programme's efficiency
- Write a report
Throughout this process students will receive important information for the contentof their projects, as, for example, relevant literature for their topic and indications on the design they should use and on how to present the final report.

The project report will be assessed by a panel of judges in public tests, after the supervisor's approval of its conclusion and quality to be presented in public tests. Assessment will be based on the scientific merit of the study and on its theoretical/methodological adequacy for public policy intervention.

Mandatory

Smith, Catherine (2010), Writing Public Policy, New York, Oxford University Press.

Moran, M, Martin Rein, e Robert Goodin (2008), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Kraft, Michael E., e Scott R. Furlong (2010), Public Policy. Politics, Analysis, and Alternatives, Washington DC, CQPress,

Kingdon, John W. (2003), Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, New York, Longman.

ISCTE (2008), Normas orientadoras para a dissertação ou trabalho de Projecto de Mestrado.

Dye, Thomas R. (2010), Understanding Public Policy, Boston, Longman.

Dror, Yehezkel (2006), ?Training for Policy Makers? in The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Ed by Michael Moran, Martin Rein, Robert Goodin, Oxford University Press.

Bransford, John (2010), How People Learn. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Bardach, Eugene (2009), A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis, Washington DC, CQPress.

Optional

1. Organization of the process of placing students in internships
a. Inform and clarify about the professional intervention areas
b. Contact institutions that can provide internships
c. Preparation of letters of support and assistance to internship
d. Identification of the place for the practical learning period
2. Internship formalization
a. Elaboration of the internship protocol with the external institution
b. Identification of the vocational guidance officer
c. Study plan definition and corresponding professional application
d. Objective definition and job prospects
3. Current and thorough knowledge of the context for bringing the educational system to the social and professional activity
a. Regular monitoring of the trainee
b. Guidance for the internship report
c. Reflection and refining of experience
4. Planning and preparing the internship report

The final score will be obtained through two evaluation elements classified on a scale from zero to twenty: i) classification contained in the evaluation form completed by the external institution at the end of the Internship; ii) evaluation of the internship report presented by the student.

The final score will be obtained using the following weighting:
- Classification attributed by the external institution and included in the evaluation form (20% of the final grade);
- Classification assigned to the internship report (80% of the final grade).

The curricular unit does not include the evaluation by examination and the evaluation elements will have to be delivered within the calendar defined by the School of Sociology and Public Policies for the corresponding academic year.

Mandatory

Bardach, E. & Patashnik, E., A practical guide for policy analysis: the eightfold path to more effective problem solving, 2020, Sage/ CQ Press.,
Cairney, P., Understanding public policy: theories and issues., 2019, Palgrave Macmillan.,
Dror, Y., Training for Policy Makers, 2006, Oxford University Press,
Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (eds.)., A modern guide to public policy., 2020, Edward Elgar Publishing.,

Optional

Não se aplica.

1 Introduction: the study of European and international public policy
1.1 Policy-making in the European and global multi-level system
1.2 Theories of public policy
2. European public policies
2.1 The Europeanisation of public policies
2.2 New modes of policy-making: experimental governance in the EU
2.3 The European Union as an actor in international politics
3. International politics
3.1 The policy-making power of international organisations
3.2 Transnational actors in international politics
3.3 The international diffusion of public policies: a new form of global governance?
4. Conclusion: "Governance without government" or "governance with many governments"?

Assessment throughout the semester includes: 1) development of a research question and identification of a theoretical/analytical approach (30%) and a final individual written assignment (70%). The final written assignment can be a research paper (up to 7 pages) or a literature review on a specific issue in the field of European and international policy analysis (up to 7 pages).
Assessment by examination consists of an individual written final paper (7 pp).

Mandatory

Börzel, T.A. and Risse, T. (2003) 'Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe', in Featherstone/Radaelli (eds), The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford, 57-80.
Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. and Simmons, B.A. (eds) (2012) Handbook of International Relations, 2nd Edition, London (cap. 13 e 17).
Enderlein, H., Zürn, M. and Wälti, S. (eds) (2010) Handbook on Multi-level Governance, Cheltenham (cap. 1 e 5).
Falkner, G. (2016). The EU?s Current Crisis and Its Policy Effects: Research Design and Comparative Findings. Journal of European Integration, 38(3), 219?235.
Schmidt, V. A. (2018). Rethinking EU Governance: From ?Old? to ?New? Approaches to Who Steers Integration Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(7), 1544?1561.
Vogler, J. (2011) 'The European Union as a Global Environmental Policy Actor', in J. Connelly and R.K.W. Wurzel (eds), The European Union as a Leader in International Climate Change Politics, London, 21-37.

Optional

Alter, K.J. (2008) 'The European Court and Legal Integration: An Exceptional Story or Harbinger of the Future?', in K.E. Whittington, R.D. Kelemen and G.A. Caldeira (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209-28.
Andresen, S. (2013) 'International Regime Effectiveness', in R. Falkner (ed.), The Handbook of Global Climate and Environment Policy, Malden: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 304-19.
Barnett, M. and Finnemore, M. (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens, P. (eds) (2014) The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bickerton, C. J., Hodson, D., & Puetter, U. (2015). The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 703?722.
Biermann, F. and Siebenhüner, B. (eds) (2009) Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Börzel, T.A. (2003) Environmental Leaders and Laggards in Europe: Why there is (not) a Southern Problem, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bulmer, S. (2009) 'Institutional and Policy Analysis in the European Union: From the Treaty of Rome to the Present', in D. Phinnemore and A. Warleigh-Lack (eds), Reflections on European Integration: 50 Years of the Treaty of Rome, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 109-24.
Busch, P.-O. and Jörgens, H. (2012) 'Governance by Diffusion: Exploring a New Mechanism of International Policy Coordination', in J. Meadowcroft, O. Langhelle and A. Ruud (eds), Governance, Democracy and Sustainable Development: Moving Beyond the Impasse?, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 221-48.
Colomer, J.M. (2016) How Global Institutions Rule the World, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Cowles, M.G., Caporaso, J.A. and Risse, T. (eds) (2001) Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Della Porta, D. and Caiani, M. (2009) Social Movements and Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Delreux, T. (2011) The EU as International Environmental Negotiator, Farnham: Ashgate.
Dingwerth, K. and Jörgens, H. (2015) 'Environmental Risks and the Changing Interface of Domestic and International Governance', in S. Leibfried et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 338-54.
Dingwerth, K. and Pattberg, P. (2009) 'Actors, Arenas, and Issues in Global Governance', in J. Whitman (ed.), Palgrave Advances in Global Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 41-66.
Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M. and Leiber, S. (2005) Complying with Europe: EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Finnemore, M. (1996) National Interests in International Society, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Heidbreder, E. G., & Brandsma, G. J. (2018). The EU Policy Process. In E. Ongaro & S. van Thiel (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe (pp. 805?821). Palgrave.
Heinelt, H., & Münch, S. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of European Policies: Interpretive Approaches to the EU. Edward Elgar.
Héritier, A., Knill, C. and Mingers, S. (1996) Ringing the Changes in Europe: Regulatory Competition and the Transformation of the State, Berlin: de Gruyter.
Herz, M. and Ribeiro Hoffmann, A. (2004) Organizações Internacionais: História e Práticas, Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
Holzinger, K., Knill, C. and Arts, B. (eds) (2008) Environmental Policy Convergence in Europe. The Impact of International Institutions and Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hooghe, L. (2001) The European Commission and the Integration of Europe. Images of Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2010) 'Types of Multi-level Governance', in H. Enderlein, M. Zürn and S. Wälti (eds), Handbook on Multi-level Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 17-31.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2019). Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-First Century. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(8), 1113?1133.
Jörgens, H., Lenschow, A. and Liefferink, D. (eds) (2014) Understanding Environmental Policy Convergence: The Power of Words, Rules and Money, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelemen, R.D. (2011) Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J.S. (2012) Power and Interdependence, Boston: Longman.
Lelieveldt, H., & Princen, S. (2011). The Politics of the European Union. Cambridge University Press.
Lynggaard, K. (2019). Discourse Analysis and European Union Politics. Palgrave.
Magone, J. M. (2016). Portugal as the ?Good Pupil of the European Union?: Living Under the Regime of the Troika. In J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-periphery Relations in the European Union: Power and Conflict in a Dualist Political Economy (pp. 179?189). Routledge.
Marks, G., Scharpf, F.W., Schmitter, P.C. and Streeck, W. (eds) (1996) Governance in the European Union, London: Sage.
Martin, L.L. and Simmons, B.A. (2012) 'International Organizations and Institutions', in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage, pp. 326-51.
Matthijs, M. and Blyth, M. (eds) (2015) The Future of the Euro, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moravcsik, A.M. (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power From Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Schmidt, V. A. (2018). Rethinking EU Governance: From ?Old? to ?New? Approaches to Who Steers Integration Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(7), 1544?1561.
Pollack, M.A. and Ruhlman, M.A. (2009) 'The Heroic Age of European Integration is Over: Institutional and Policy Developments, 1957-2007', in D. Phinnemore and A. Warleigh-Lack (eds), Reflections on European Integration: 50 Years of the Treaty of Rome, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43-73.
Princen, S. (2009) Agenda-Setting in the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Richardson, J., & Mazey, S. (Eds.). (2015). European Union: Power and Policy-Making (4th ed.). Routledge.
Risse, T. (2012) 'Transnational Actors and World Politics', in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage, pp. 426-52.
Sabel, C.F. and Zeitlin, J. (eds) (2010) Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sabel, C.F. and Zeitlin, J. (2010) 'Learning From Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU', in C.F. Sabel and J. Zeitlin (eds), Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-28.
Sandholtz, W. and Stone Sweet, A. (eds) (1998) European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scharpf, F.W. (2010) 'Multi-level Europe - The Case for Multiple Concepts', in H. Enderlein, M. Zürn and S. Wälti (eds), Handbook on Multi-level Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 66-79.
Schmidt, V.A. (2006) Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Warleigh-Lack, A. and Drachenberg, R. (2010) 'Policy Making in the European Union', in M. Cini and N. Pérez-Solórzano Borragán (eds), European Union Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209-24.
Weiss, T. G., & Wilkinson, R. (Eds.). (2018). International Organization and Global Governance (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Zahariadis, N., & Buonanno, L. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge Handbook of European Public Policy. Routledge.
Zaun, N. (2016). Why EU Asylum Standards Exceed the Lowest Common Denominator: The Role of Regulatory Expertise in EU Decision-Making. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(1), 136?154.
Zürn, M. (2010) 'Global Governance as Multi-level Governance', in H. Enderlein, M. Zürn and S. Wälti (eds), Handbook on Multi-level Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 80-99.

1 - Why study public policy?
2 - Theories of power and political process
3 - Concepts of Public Policy Analysis: actors, resources, rules and institutions.
4 - Analysis of the political process:
Types of policies and phases of the process;
Problems and scheduling;
Alternatives and interest groups;
Formulation design and instruments;
Decision and implementation;
communication;
Evaluation, impact and change.
5 - International influence: diffusion, conveyance and convergence in public policy.
6 - Policy research
7 - Public Policy in Portugal.

Written exercise (maximum 20 pages) with the analysis of a sectorial public policy (50%); Presentation and discussion of a public poster, synthesis analysis exercise of a public policy (40%); Active participation in class (10%). Active participation in class includes attending classes, but also the ability to ask questions, argue, defend points of view and participate in discussions on the topics under discussion.

Mandatory

Theodoulou, Stella, e Matthew Cahn (1995). Public Policy: The Essential Readings, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Rodrigues, Maria de Lurdes (coord.) (2014). Exercícios de Análise de Políticas Públicas, Lisboa, INCM;
Parsons, Wayne (1996). Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis, Edward Elgar Pub;
Kraft, Michael E., e Scott R. Furlong (2010), Public Policy. Politics, Analysis, and Alternatives, Washington DC, CQPress,
Knoepfel, Peter, Corrine Larrue, Frédéric Varone, e Michael Hill (2011). Public Policy Analysis. Bristol, Polity Press University of Bristol;
Kingdon, John W. (2003), Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, New York, Longman.
Hill, Michael (2009), The Public Policy Process, London, Pearson/Longman.
Dye, Thomas R. (2010), Understanding Public Policy, Boston, Longman.
Birkland, Thomas (2020). An Introduction to the Policy Process, New York, Routledge;
Anderson, James (2003). Public Policymaking. Boston. Houghton Mifflin Company;

Optional

Smith, Catherine (2010), Writing Public Policy, New York, Oxford University Press
Sabatier, Paul (2007, 2019). Theories of the Policy Process, Colorado, Westview Press;
Rodrigues, Maria de Lurdes, e Helena Carreiras; (org.) (2017). Exercícios de Análise de Políticas Públicas 2, Lisboa, Editora
Rodrigues, M. L. e Silva, P. A. (org.) (2013), Políticas públicas para a Reforma do Estado, Coimbra, Almedina;
Rodrigues, Maria de Lurdes, e Pedro Adão e Silva (org.) (2012). Políticas Públicas em Portugal, Lisboa, INCM;
Quiñones, Edgar (2015). Políticas Públicas: Métodos Conceptuales y Métodos de Evaluatión, Huncayo, Universidad Continental;
Ordóñez-Matamoros, Gonzalo (2013). Manual de Análisis y Diseño de Políticas Públicas, Bogotá, Universidade Externaso
Moran, M, Martin Rein, e Robert Goodin (2008), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Knill, Christoph, e Jale Tosun (2012). Public Policy: A New Introduction, Hampshire, Palgrave Macmillan
Howlett, Michael (2019). The Policy Design Primer. Choosing the Right Tools for the Job. New York, Routledge;
Cairney, Paul (2011, 2020). Understanding Public Policy, London, Red Globe Press;
Bardach, Eugene (2009), A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis, Washington DC, CQPress.
Araújo, Luísa, e Maria de Lurdes Rodrigues (2017). "Modelos de Análise de Políticas Públicas", Sociologia Problemas e Práticas, n.º 83;

CP1 - The Research Process
1.1 Introduction to the Research Process in Social Sciences
1.2 The Stages of the Research Process
1.3 Research Methods and Techniques: Key Notions and Characteristics
CP2 - Extensive Research
2.1 Extensive Research: Main Characteristics
2.2 Planning and Conducting Surveys using Questionnaires
2.3 Key Sampling Techniques
2.4 Types of Questions, Construction, and Validation of Questionnaires
2.5 Online Surveys
CP3 - Intensive Research
3.1 Intensive Research: Main Characteristics
3.2 Types of Interviews and Levels of Directiveness
3.3 Planning and Conducting Interviews
3.4 Developing Interview Guides
CP4 - Analysis and Interpretation of Quantitative and Qualitative Data
4.1 Structure of quantitative databases
4.2 Variables and Types of Variables
4.3 Interpretation of Tables and Graphs and their Suitability to Types of Variables
4.4 Content Analysis of Interviews and Other Documents

Students can choose one of the two assessment methods established for this UC in accordance with the General Regulation on Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (RGACC) of ISCTE: Assessment throughout the semester and Assessment by exam.

Assessment throughout the semester: This assessment method consists of two components: Methodological Applications Pathway (60%) and Group Assignment (40%).

a) Methodological Applications Pathway: This component consists of a sequence of methodological exercises that challenge students to apply the knowledge acquired in each block of programmatic contents of the UC. The exercises are completed individually throughout the semester, either synchronously or asynchronously, allowing for continuous assessment of students and their progress in the field of social research methods. To remain assessed throughout the semester, students may opt to skip the submission of only one of the proposed methodological exercises. The grade obtained in this component accounts for 60% of the final grade for the UC.

b) Group Assignment: This component involves analyzing two empirical studies, one intensive and one extensive, based on the examination of two master’s theses related to the students' areas of interest. Preference should be given to analyzing master’s theses developed within the scientific field of the student's enrolled master's program. The work can be done in groups (two members) or individually. The document must be written according to the structure proposed by the teaching team. To remain assessed throughout the semester, students must achieve a minimum grade of 10 points on the Group Assignment. The grade obtained in this component accounts for 40% of the final grade for the UC.

In addition to the minimum requirements for each component, assessment throughout the semester requires students to attend at least 60% of the classes.

Assessment by exam: This assessment occurs exclusively during the exam period and covers all the material taught in the curricular unit, with both theoretical and theoretical-practical questions. It consists of an individual written exam designed to evaluate both the practical skills for applying social research methods and the theoretical knowledge gained from reading the main bibliography. Students who have chosen this assessment method, as well as those who did not pass the assessment throughout the semester, are eligible for this assessment method.

Mandatory

Albarello, L. et al. (2011). Práticas e métodos de investigação em ciências sociais. Gradiva.
Bardin, L. (2020). Análise de conteúdo (Edição revista e ampliada). Edições 70.
Beaud, S., & Weber, F. (2007). Guia para a pesquisa de campo. Editora Vozes.
Bryman, A. (2022). Social research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Campenhoudt, L. V., Marquet, J., & Quivy, R. (2023). Manual de investigação em ciências sociais (2ª ed. rev.). Gradiva.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Foddy, W. (1996). Como perguntar – Teoria e prática da construção de perguntas para entrevistas e questionários. Celta Editora.
Ghiglione, R., & Matalon, B. (1992). O inquérito – Teoria e prática. Celta Editora.
Maroco, J. (2021). Análise estatística com o SPSS Statistics (7ª ed.). ReportNumber.

Optional

Becker, H. (1997). Métodos de pesquisa em Ciências Sociais. Hucitec.
Bertaux, D. (2020). As narrativas de vida. Mundos Sociais.
Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (1993). Análise de dados em ciências sociais: introdução às técnicas utilizando o SPSS. Celta Editora.
Burgess, R. (2001). A pesquisa de terreno: uma introdução. Celta Editora.
DeCastellarnau, A. (2018). A classification of response scale characteristics that affect data quality: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1523-1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0533-4
Della Porta, D., & Keating, M. (Orgs.). (2008). Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Laureano, R., & Botelho, M. C. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics: O meu manual de consulta rápida (3ª ed.). Sílabo.
Moreira, J. M. (2004). Questionários: Teoria e Prática. Almedina.
Oliveira, A. et al. (2021). O questionário online na investigação em educação: reflexões epistemológicas, metodológicas e éticas. Universidade Aberta.
Paugam, S. (Coord.). (2015). A pesquisa sociológica. Editora Vozes.
Silva, A. S., & Pinto, J. M. (2014 [1986]). Metodologia das ciências sociais. Edições Afrontamento.
Silverman, D. (2011). Interpreting qualitative data (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sue, V. e Ritter, L.A. (2012). Conducting Online Surveys (2ª ed.), Thousand Oaks, Sage.
Vicente, P., Reis, E. & Ferrão, F. (2001). Sondagens. A amostragem como factor decisivo de qualidade. Sílabo.

01 Introduction: controversies and domains in sociological theory
I History of sociological theory
02 Classical sociological theory
03 Modern sociological theory
04 Contemporary sociological theory
II Domains of sociological theory
05 Interaction as exchange
06 Symbolic interaction
07 Stratification
08 Institutions
09 Groups and networks
10 Organisations

One individual paper, with a maximum of 20,000 characters including spaces, on a subject that each student choose from a fixed list. Deadline: December 29, 2023.

Mandatory

Pires, Rui Pena (2007), ?Árvores conceptuais: uma reconstrução multidimensional dos conceitos de ação e de estrutura?, Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 53, pp. 11-50.
Scott, John (2011), Conceptualising the Social World: Principles of Sociological Analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Turner, Jonathan H. (1994, 1999), Sociologia: Conceitos e Aplicações, São Paulo, Makron Books.

Optional

* Bibliografia de trabalho / referências das aulas
Baert, Patrick, e Filipe Carreira da Silva (2014), Teoria Social Contemporânea, Lisboa, Mundos Sociais:
cap. 3, ?O enigma da vida quotidiana: o interacionismo simbólico, a abordagem dramatúrgica e a etnometodologia?, pp. 81-112.
Fulcher, James, e John Scott (2011), Sociology, 4.ª ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press: cap. 2, ?Theories and theorizing?, pp. 20-68.
Pires, Rui Pena (2014), ?Modelo teórico de análise sociológica?, Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 74, pp. 31-50.
Ritzer, George, e Jeffrey Stepnisky (2018), Sociological Theory, 10.ª ed., Nova Iorque, McGraw-Hill:
[complementar] cap. 6, ?A historical sketch of sociological theory: The later years?, pp. 261-311;
cap. 13, ?Micro-macro and agency-structure integration?, pp. 592-647.
Turner, Jonathan H. (1991), The Structure of Sociological Theory, 5.ª ed., Belmont (Cal.), Wadsworth: cap. 1, ?Sociological theory: diversity and disagreement?, pp. 1-30.
Turner, Jonathan H. (1994, 1999), Sociologia: Conceitos e Aplicações, São Paulo, Makron Books:
cap. 1, ?A natureza e as origens da sociologia?, pp. 1-16;
cap. 2, ?Propostas teóricas e metodológicas na sociologia?, pp. 17-32;
cap. 7, ?Grupos e organizações?, pp. 93-110;
cap. 8, ?Desigualdades: classe, etnia e género?, pp. 111-134;
cap. 9, ?Instituições?, pp. 137-166.
Turner, Jonathan H. (2010), Theoretical Principles of Sociology, vol. 1, Macrodynamics,
Nova Iorque, Springer:
[complementar] cap 4, ?The dynamics of institutional domains?, pp. 105-151.
[complementar] cap 5, ?The dynamics of stratification systems?, pp. 153-214.
Turner, Jonathan H. (2012), Theoretical Principles of Sociology, vol. 3, Mesodynamics,
Nova Iorque, Springer:
[complementar] cap. 5, ?The dynamics of groups?, pp. 171-212;
[complementar] cap. 6, ?The dynamics of organizations?, pp. 213-301.
Turner, Jonathan H. (2013), Theoretical Sociology: 1830 to Present, Londres, Sage:
[complementar] cap. 15, ?Exchange theorizing?, pp. 520-573.
Turner, Jonathan H. (2014), Theoretical Sociology: A Concise Introduction to Twelve Sociological Theories, Londres, Sage:
cap 5, ?Exchange theorizing?, pp. 73-95;
[complementar] cap. 6, ?Symbolic interactionist theorizing?, pp. 96-116;
[complementar] cap. 7, ?Dramaturgical theorizing?, pp. 117-135.

1. Introduction: the funtions of the State and economic policies

2. States and markets in economic theory: the major debates in historical perspective
2.1. From Mercantilism to Classical Liberalism
2.2. The neoclassical logic: Liberalism and intervention in a microeconomic perspective (welfare economics)
2.3. The keynesian logic: Intervention in a macroeconomic perspective
2.4. Neoliberalism and the return of the market

3. Economic and public policies in a context of crisis and uncertainty
3.1. From the 'great Recession' to the inflationary crisis.
3.2. (De)Globalization: ideological and geopolitical reconfigurations
3.3. The challenges of the relation between human activity and Nature

Periodic assessment: individual essay (100%)
Final assessment: written exam

Mandatory

Backhouse, Roger (2002), The Penguin History of Economics, London: Penguin Books.
Fricke, Thomas et al. (2023), Mapping the State of a Shifting Paradigm: New Thinking, New Actors, Berlim: Forum New Economy.
Medema, Steven G. (2003), "The Economic Role of Government in the History of Economic Thought", In Samuels, Warren J., Jeff E. Biddle e John B. Davis (ed.), A companion to the history of economic thought. London: Blackwell, pp. 428-437.
Pereira, P.; Afonso, A.; Arcanjo, M. e Santos, J. (2016), Economia e Finanças Públicas. 5.ª Edição, Lisboa: Escolar Editora.
Stiglitz, Joseph and Jay Rosengard (2015), Economics of the Public Sector, 4th edition, New York: W.W.Norton.

Optional

Babb, Sarah (2013), ?The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: Its origins, trajectory and likely successor?, Review of International Political Economy, 20 (2): 268-297.
Beaud, Michel e Gilles Dostaler (1995), Economic Thought since Keynes, London and New York: Routledge. [Está também disponível na biblioteca a edição original em francês, de 1993].
Birdsall, Nancy e Francis Fukuyama (2011), 'The Post-Washington Consensus: Development After the Crisis', Foreign Affairs, 90(2): 45-53.
Bonefeld, Werner (2012), "Freedom and the Strong State: On German Ordoliberalism", New Political Economy, 17(5): 633-656.
Blyth, Mark (2013), Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea, New York: Oxford University Press. [Existe tradução portuguesa da Quetzal, de 2013].
Carvalho, Luís Francisco e João Rodrigues (2015), "Are markets everywhere? Understanding contemporary processes of commodification", In John B. Davis e Wilfred Dolfsma (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Social Economics, 2nd Edition, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.293-313.
Carvalho, Luís Francisco (2023), 'Notas sobre conceitos e indicadores fundamentais da actividade económica' (mimeo), versão revista e actualizada, Lisboa: Iscte-Iul.
Chang, Ha Joon (2002), "Breaking the mould: an institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo liberal theory of the market and the state", Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26 (5): 539-559.
Colgan, Jeff D. and Robert O. Kehoane (2017), "The Liberal Order is Rigged: Fix It or Watch It Wither", Foreign Affairs, 96(3): 36-44.
Fahnbulleh, Miatt (2020), 'The Neoliberal Collapse: Markets are not the Answer', Foreign Affairs, 99 (1): 38-43.
Foroohar, Rana (2022). 'After Neoliberalism: All Economics is Local', Foreign Affairs, 101(6): 134-145.
Foucault, Michel (2010 [1979]), Nascimento da Biopolítica, Lisboa: Edições 70.
Friedman, Milton (1968), "The role of monetary policy", The American Economic Review 58 (1): 1-17.
Gamble, Andrew (2014), Crisis Without End? The Unravelling of Western Prosperity, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Harvey, David (2005), A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hayek, Friedrich August (1945), "The use of knowledge in society", American Economic Review, 35 (4): 519-530.
Hu, Fred and Michael Spence (2017), "Why Globalization Stalled, and How to Restart It", Foreign Affairs, 96(6): 54-63.
Keynes, John Maynard (1967 [1936]), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: MacMillan.
Keynes, Milo (ed.) (1975), Essays on John Maynard Keynes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Magnusson, Lars e Bo Strath (2016), A Brief History of Political Economy: Tales of Marx, Keynes and Hayek, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Mazzucato, Mariana (2011), 'The Entrepeneurial State', Soundings, 49: 131-142.
O'Neil, Shannon K. (2022), 'The Myth of the Global: Why Regional Ties Win the Day', Foreign Affairs, 101(4): 158-169.
Polanyi, Karl (2001[1944]), The Great Transformation - The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Boston: Beacon Press. [Existe tradução portuguesa das Edições 70, de 2012].
Reich, Robert (2016), Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not for the Few, New York: Vintage Books.
Rodrik, Dani (2011), The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States, and Democracy Can't Coexist, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, Kenneth (2022), 'The Age of Inflation: Easy Money, Hard Choices', Foreign Affairs, 101(6): 120-133.
Stiglitz, Joseph (2010), Freefall: Free Markets and the Sinking of the Global Economy, London: Allen Lane.
Stiglitz, Joseph (2018), Globalization and Its Discontents Revisited, New York and London: W.W. Norton.
Stiglitz, Joseph (2019), People, Power and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent, London: Allen Lane.
Tebble, A.J. (2009), "Hayek and social justice: a critique", Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 12(4): 581-604.
UNDP (2022), Human Development Report 2021/2022, New York: United Nations.

1. Governance, State and law
2. Juridicization of public policies: from the politics of law to the public policies law
3. Constitutional law, Public Administration law and Public Policies Law
4. Public policies in the areas of sovereignty and law
5. Economic, social and cultural public policies and law
6. Public policies of land use planning and law
7. Democratization and desestatization of public interest

The UC can be attended under continuous assessment or final exam. Continuous assessment rule: (a) Assessment test which consists of a written individual work, based on the suggested bibliography (maximum 20 pages), which accounts for 75% of the grade (b) Oral presentation of a theme (10/15 minutes), one or two articles from the bibliography or supplementary literature, which accounts for 25% of the grade.

The class attendance rule: 75% mandatory attendance

Mandatory

Rosenbloom, David H., Robert S. Kravchuk e Richard M. Clerkin (2009), Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics and Law in the Public Sector, Nova Iorque, McGraw Hill
Gomes, João Salis (2010), Interesse público, controle democrático do Estado e cidadania, in Augusto de Athayde et al (org.), Em Homenagem ao Professor Doutor Diogo Freitas do Amaral, Coimbra, Almedina, pp. 354-378
Garcia, Maria da Glória Dias (2009), Direito das políticas públicas, Coimbra, Almedina
Commaille, Jacques, Laurence Dumoulin e Cécile Robert (dir.) (2000), La juridicisation du politique - Leçons scientifiques, Paris, L.G.D.J.
Caupers, João e Vera Eiró (2016), Introdução ao Direito Administrativo, Lisboa, Âncora
Canotilho, Gomes e Vital Moreira (2014), Constituição da República Portuguesa anotada, Coimbra, Coimbra Editora
Canotilho, Gomes (2017), Direito Constitucional e Teoria da Constituição, Coimbra, Almedina
Amaral, Diogo Freitas do (2018), Curso de Direito Administrativo, Coimbra, Almedina

Optional

Rolo, Nuno Miguel da Cunha (2020). Manual de Administração e Governação Pública, Lisboa, AAFDL
Otero, Paulo (2007), Legalidade e Administração Pública - O sentido da vinculação administrativa à juridicidade, Coimbra, Almedina
Mockle, Daniel (2007), La gouvernance, le droit et l'État, Bruxelas, Bruylant
Gonçalves, Maria Eduarda, e Pierre Guibentif (2008), Novos Territórios do Direito - Europeização, Globalização e Transformação da Regulação Jurídica, Lisboa, Principia
Gomes, João Salis (1998), "A perspectiva jurídica na avaliação de políticas públicas", em A Avaliação na Administração Pública, Acta Geral do 1º Encontro INA, Oeiras, Instituto Nacional de Administração, pp. 197-209
Gomes, João Salis (2000), "Qualidade da regulação jurídica e redefinição estratégica da gestão pública", separata da Revista de Administração Local nº 179, Lisboa
Estorninho, Maria João (2009), A fuga para o direito privado. Contributo para o estudo da actividade de direito privado da Administração Pública, Coimbra, Almedina
Bucci, Maria Paula Dallari (2006), Direito Administrativo e Políticas Públicas, São Paulo, Editora Saraiva
Andrade, José Carlos Vieira de (2007), A Justiça Administrativa (Lições), Coimbra, Almedina

1. Research as a producer of knowledge to know and/or to intervene.
1.1. Empirical research as theoretically oriented.
1.2. Research as problem solving: diagnosis, evaluation, intervention.
1.3. Ethics in different types of research.

2. How to design a research project and/or intervention.
2.1. Formulation of the problem and definition of objectives.
2.2. Conceptualization.
2.3. Operationalization and observation.
2.4. Project's design.

3. Methodological strategies.
3.1. Adequacy of the methodological strategies to the objectives of tthe research.
3.2. Extensive research: large surveys, statistical databases, etc..
3.3. Intensive research: case studies, field research, participant observation, ethnographic approach, etc.
3.4. Action research and social intervention.
3.5. Comparative research: objectives and problems of comparison.
3.6. Mixed methods.

The learning process proceeds trough theoretical-practical classes, seminar presentations and debate (which are given prevalence), tutorials and students' autonomous work.

|

Evaluation along the semester, comprising the following components:
(a) Class participation and presentation of the research and/or intervention project (35%)
b) Final written work: research project and/or intervention (65%).
OR
Final assessment, consisting of a final written work: research project and/or intervention, complemented with an oral discussion, if the teacher considers necessary (100%).

The evaluation of this course does not include a final exam.

Mandatory

Ragin, C2019Constructing social research.Pine Forge.
Quivy, R&Champenhoud,L2003Manual de Investigação em Ciências Sociais.Gradiva.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. 2023 Practical Research: Planning and Design. Pearson. 
Della Porta, D&M Keating, eds 2008 Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences.CUP.
Creswell, JW 2003 Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.Sage.
Chen, H 2015 Practical program evaluation: theory-driven evaluation and the integrated evaluation perspective.Sage.
Capucha, L 2008 Planeamento e avaliação de projectos: guião prático.DGIDC.
Campenhoudt, L van 2003 Introdução à análise dos fenómenos sociais.Gradiva.
Booth, Wayne C. et al 2016 The Craft of Research.The University of Chicago Press.
Burgess, R 2001 A pesquisa de terreno.Celta.
Bryman, A 2016 Social Research Methods.UP.
Blaikie, N 2007 Approaches to social enquiry.Polity Press.
Alasuutari, P, Bickman, L., and Brannen, J. 2008 Sage Handbook on Social Research Methods. Sage.

Optional

Whyte, William Foote (ed.) (1991) Participatory Action Research. London: Sage Publications.
Turner, Jonathan (2005) "A new approach for theoretically integrating micro and macro analysis", in Craig Calhoun, C. Rojek,B. Turner (Ed.) , The Sage Handbook of Sociology. London: Sage Publications.
Roberts, B. 2007 Getting the Most Out of the Research Experience. London: Sage.
Turner, F J. (2005). Social Work Diagnosis in Contemporary Practice. New York, Oxford: University Press.
Silverman, D (ed.) (2011) Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Scott, J. (1990) A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Schiefer, U, et al. (2007) Método aplicado de planeamento e Avaliação. Manual de Planeamento e Avaliação de Projectos. Estoril: Editora Principia.
Ragin, C C. (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.
Oyen, Else (1990) Comparative methodology. Theory and practice in international social research. London: Sage.
Patton, M. (2018) Facilitating evaluation: principles in practice. Sage Thousand Oaks.
Kettner, P., Moroney, R. & Martin, L. (2016). Designing and managing programs: an effectiveness-based approach. (5nd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Iphofen, R., Ed. (2020) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer.
Ghiglione, R & Matalon, B (1992) O Inquérito. Teoria e Prática. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
Foddy, William (1996) Como perguntar. Teoria e Prática da construção de perguntas para entrevistas e questionários. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
European Institute of Public Administration (2004) Improving an organization through self-assessment? common assessment framework. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.
Dogan, M & Pelassy, D (1990, 1984) How to Compare Nations. Strategies in Comparative Politics. New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers.
Carvalho, H (2004) Análise Multivariada de Dados Qualitativos. Lisboa: Sílabo.
Calley, N. (2011). Program development in the 21st Century: an evidence-based approach to design, implementation and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Brannen, J (2005) Mixed methods research: a discussion paper, Economic & Social Research Council, National Centre for Research Methods. URL: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/89/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-005.pdf
Brady, H E & Collier, D (2004) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools Shared Standards. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Booth, W C, Colomb, G G e Williams, J M (2003) The Craft of Research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bertaux, D. (2020) As narrativas de vida. Lisboa: Mundos Sociais.
Beckett, C (2010) Assessment and intervention in social work. Sage Publications: London.
Na medida em que o desenho de pesquisa pode ter algumas especificidades em função da área científica de pesquisa, listam-se abaixo algumas sugestões de suporte bibliográfico.
Becker, Howard S. (2017) Evidence, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Mestrado em Sociologia
Shaw, I, Briar-Lawson, K, Orme, J & Ruckdeschel, R 2010 The Sage Handbook of Social Work Research. Londres: Sage.
Hardwick, L et al (eds) 2017 Innovations in Social Work Research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Bell, L 2017 Research methods for Social Workers. Londres: Palgrave.
Mestrado em Serviço Social
Toshkov, D 2016 Research Design in Political Science. London: Palgrave.
Howard, C 2017 Thinking Like a Political Scientist: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Filho, Dalson Britto Figueiredo; Paranhos, Ranulfo; Rocha, Enivaldo Carvalho da; Silva Junior, José Alexandre da; Santos, Manoel Leonardo Wanderley Duarte 2012 Levando Gary King a Sério: Desenhos de Pesquisa em Ciência Política. In Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Política 3 (1-2), pp. 86-117.
Capucha, L. e Caramelo, S. (2024). Ciências Sociais Aplicadas - Planeamento e Avaliação de Políticas Públicas. Coimbra: Almedina.
Bukve, O 2019 Designing Social Science Research. Cham: Palgrave.
Mestrado em Políticas Públicas
Treadwell, D, & Davis, A 2016 Introducing communication research: Paths of inquiry. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 3ª ed.
Silverman, D. (2017) Doing Qualitative Research. Londres: Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/doing-qualitative-research/book251108
Quan-Haase, A., & Sloan, L. (eds.). 2022 The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage.
Kubitschko, S., & Kaun, A. (eds). 2016 Innovative methods in media and communication research. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hine, C. (2017). Digital Ethnography. In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory, B.S. Turner (Ed.).
Berger, A. A. 2018 Media and communication research methods: An introduction to qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Mestrado em Gestão dos Novos Media
Klotz, A & Prakash, D (eds) 2008 Qualitative methods in International Relations: A pluralist guide. New York: Palgrave (v. plataforma moodle).
Sprinz, D F & Wolinsky, Y (eds.) 2004 Cases, numbers and models: International Relations research methods. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press. (Em linha: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/89c3/34b5c514acb817b8862dcdf675bd7d4863de.pdf
https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/71316_Lamont_Research_Methods_in_International_Relations_Chapter_1.pdf).
Lamont, C 2015 Research methods in International Relations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications (capitulo 1 on-line em:
Mestrado em Estudos Internacionais
Stein, T. S., Bathurst, J. R., & Lasher, R. 2022 Performing arts management: A handbook of professional practices. Simon and Schuster.
Quan-Haase, A., & Sloan, L. (Eds.). 2022 The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. 2010 Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.
Mestrado em Estudos e Gestão da Cultura
Zeleza, T (ed) 2007 The study of Africa. The global and transnational engagements (Vol II). Dakar: CODESRIA.
Zeleza, T (ed) 2006 The Study of Africa. Disciplinary and interdisciplinary encounters (Vol I). Dakar: CODESRIA.
Ouédraogo, J-B & Cardoso, C (ed) 2011 Readings in methodology: African Perspectives. Dakar: CODESRIA. Em linha: https://www.codesria.org/spip.php?article1502&lang=en
Mestrado em Estudos Africanos
Amado, J. (Org.). (2013). Manual de investigação qualitativa em educação. Coimbra: Imprensa da UC.
Bogdan, R & Biklen, S 1994 Investigação qualitativa em educação: uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Porto: Porto Editora.Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Ed.). London: Routledge.
Dal-Farra, R. A. & Lopes P. T. C. (2013). Métodos mistos de pesquisa em educação: pressupostos teóricos, Nuances: estudos sobre Educação, 24(3), 67-80.
Gay, L., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research. Competencies for analysis and applications. Columbus, OH: Pearson.
Tuckman, B. (2005). Manual de investigação em Educação. Lisboa: F.C.G.
Mestrado em Educação e Sociedade
Treadwell, D, & Davis, A 2016 Introducing communication research: Paths of inquiry. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 3ª ed.
Quan-Haase, A., & Sloan, L. (eds.). 2022 The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage.
Kubitschko, S., & Kaun, A. (eds). 2016 Innovative methods in media and communication research. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Berger, A. A. 2018 Media and communication research methods: An introduction to qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Mestrado em Comunicação, Cultura e Tecnologias da Informação
Se necessário, solicitar referências adicionais ao/à(s) docente(s).
Mestrado em Ciências do Trabalho e Relações Laborais
Pollock III, Philip H.& Edwards, B C 2019 The Essentials of political analysis. 6ªed., Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
Silverman, D (2018) Doing qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.
Johnson, J B & Reynolds, H T 2020 Political Science research methods, 9ª ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
Mestrado em Ciência Política
Se necessário, solicitar referências adicionais ao/à(s) docente(s).
Mestrado em Administração Escolar
Se necessário, solicitar referências adicionais ao/à(s) docente(s).
Mestrado em Ação Humanitária