Faculty
Alexandra Cláudia Rebelo Paio
Inês Costa Santos de Sousa Nascimento
Objectives
"(LO1) Critically reflect on the challenges of education in the future, questioning existing paradigms and exploring new pedagogical approaches;
(LO2) Investigate how radical and utopian imagination can reshape spatial, social, and educational models, promoting innovative and sustainable solutions;
(LO3) Integrate knowledge from different fields, such as Literature, Arts & Media, Architecture, Landscape, Photography, and Visual Arts, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration;
(LO4) Apply practical methodologies to develop experimental and creative proposals, encouraging a speculative and provocative approach;
(LO5) Explore the University Campus as an experimental laboratory to test and propose new models of community interaction;
(LO6) Address emerging challenges in architecture and urbanism, promoting adaptable and innovative solutions."
Program
"Online Session – Pre-Workshop Activities
Opening and team introduction
Collaborative learning and Q&A session
On-Site Activities (BIP)
1st Masterclass: Collaboration and Interdisciplinarity
Lecture 1: Commons
Lecture 2: Transdisciplinarity
Workshop 1 – ROLEPLAYING
Roundtable 1 & Work Lab 1
2nd Masterclass: Radical and Utopian Imagination
Lecture 3: Education
Lecture 4: Literature
Lecture 5: Arts & Media
Workshop 2 – STORYTELLING
Roundtable 2 & Work Lab 2
3rd Masterclass: The Campus as an Ecosystem
Lecture 6: Architecture
Lecture 7: Landscape
Lecture 8: Photography
Workshop 3 – IMAGE(NING)
Field Visit
Laboratory: Creating an Intervention
Lecture 10: Creativity
Lecture 11: Visual Arts & Comic Strip
Workshop 4 – (PRO)TESTING
Laboratory: Intervening in the Field
Work Lab – Collective Installation
Final Presentation
Online Session – Post-Workshop Activities
Critical reflection on the results"
Evaluation process
"(PA1) Given the highly practical nature of this unit, assessment is conducted exclusively through a continuous evaluation system throughout the semester. This requires a minimum attendance of 70% in classes, periodic discussions of the exercises, and a final presentation to a panel of lecturers. The final grade is determined as follows: 70% for the exercise, 10% for class participation, and 20% for the final presentation (mandatory);
(PA2) The unit does not include a final exam in its assessment system."
Bibliography
Mandatory Bibliography
"Coleman, N. (2005). Utopias and architecture. Routledge Colomina, B., Galán, I. G., Kotsioris, E., & Meister, A.-M. (Eds.). (2022). Radical pedagogies. The MIT Press Fitz, A. & Krasny, E., (Eds.). (2019). Critical care: Architecture and urbanism for a broken planet. MIT Press Harriss, H., & Froud, D. (Eds.). (2015). Radical Pedagogies: Architectural Education and the British Tradition. RIBA Publishing Culek, J. (2020). ""Utopia as a Critical Method."" Archined Gadanho, P. (2015). ""Back to Life, Back to Reality: The 'New Normal.'"" Shrapnel Contemporary Jedenov, K., & Afonso, F. (2017). ""Crisis as the New Normal: Preparing Architecture Students for Uncertainty in Social, Economic and Ecological Dynamics."" Charrette, 4(1), 40-57 Kasperzyk, D. (1991).""Pragmatic Utopias: Planning With Nature."" Living Together. Sustainable Community Development, 29, 44 Waterman, T. (2016).""Utopian Method for Minds, Bodies, and Media in Architectural Design"". Open Library of Humanities, 2(2), 1–29"
Optional Bibliography